Smart Israel, back on Attack [7/31/2006]

Smart Israel, back on Attack [7/31/2006]

The needs to end, when the war is won, not when the UN feels the terrorist group needs a rest…

I was thinking that was a dumb move for Israel to go on a ceasefire for 48-hours, then when I went to bed I had a feeling they were throwing out a canopy—or smoke screen, and yes, back to war they went, a smart thing, they caught the enemy with their pants down. That’s what I would have done anyhow. You don’t fight a war according to UN policy, or anyone’s policy, you fight to win; just like the enemy. The quicker the west learns that, the better off we’ll all be. Lebanon-based Hezbollah militia thought they were going to have a holiday, sorry folks, not anymore. The war they started they will have to deal with. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert may be worth his salt. The UN stopped the peacekeeping force in Lebanon, also a smart idea, it does no one any good anyhow, they can’t stop the war, and no one sees them as a threat. U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan cannot get his killing completed now on the Jews. He wanted to save the lives of the terrorist so they could have another day of killing, sorry Mr. Annan, not today. I think Israel is saying: I can lie just as good as everyone else, or have a pretence as the UN and Hezbollah, I mean, if your going to play the game, let’s all go by ‘no rules bared,’ concept, not just rules for Israel, as Annan would have it, as the Arabs laugh at as if they’ve really won the war; I get the feeling, they will get another defeat soon.

Hazbollah’s Qana Charade

Hazbollah’s Qana Charade

See it for what it is:


[Let’s get back to the war Israel] When Hezbollah put there soldiers, bombs and rocket launching equipment next to building, inside building, mosques, and homes, it is only obvious, they do not care if they kill their own kind, and it can’t be allowed to stop a war because they do not want to play by the rules. Annan is the biggest, murder of them all, and the last man I’d take advise from. It is sad what happened in Qana, but it is even sadder that such people like Annan can’t see through his glasses straight where the rockets are being hid. What good are the observers over in Lebanon, when they are not observing anything but Jewish rockets hitting targets, the UN don’t want them to hit. After 19-days of fighting, this should get the message to them, the US is alert to this, and so is England, but France, the UN, EU are not. I doubt Russia and China give a shit that kills who over there.
I really do think Annan is a terrorist himself, and we need to condemn him for his ignorance; he says he is deeply dismayed. Over what? His terrorist group getting their Asses kicked. He’s half the problem. The UN could run much better without this Antichrist at the helm.
I suggest Israel stop the 48-hour ceasefire early, and get back to business, before the world body gets sympathetic for the terrorist again, and scorn worse the victories of Israel. The people of Qana were warned so my guess is, the families that stayed behind, or anybody that stayed behind (and perhaps the Terrorist would not allow the families to go) wanted to, and they got the response they expected, the world body to shoult loud and clear at Israel, it is how they fight. If I were sitting on a toilet full of dynamite, and someone called me to get my ass moving because you are now in a war zone, I’d ask which way and be go, and be gone, and if I got no answer, I’d be gone anyhow.
It is obvious also, that Hezbollah, chose this site long ago, for this very reason, that when attacked, this was bound to take place, thus, endangering civilians, which they could care less about; I am not surprised Hezbollah is not getting any of the blame, it is all a charade. Hezbollah has turned that town into a war zone, and again Annan as usual, can see the trees in front of the forest. Syria and Iran should pay the price for arming this terrorist, Hezbollah. To be quite honest, this is old news, ten years ago; blood was shed in this area.
During their grieving, and 48-hour ceasefire, Hezbollah, has shout close to 140-rockets into Israel, but Annan of the UN, has not said anything about that, why? The Lebanese are reacting to the airstricks on their country; too bad they don’t react to the Hezbollah whom are using their country for the crusade.

Logic for an illogical war: Lebanon vs. Israel

Logic for an illogical war:
Lebanon vs. Israel


Lebanon is boasting Israel can’t win the war, and therefore why make concessions; I suppose the best thing to do is drop more bombs, if that is the way they feel, until there is no one lift, and then boast over some street in Damascus, where it all started. I do know this: last week they were shooting 80-rockets a day into Israel, and a week before that 110, and now 39-a day, so Lebanon is not as healthy military wise, as they were a few weeks ago.
Why the UN wants Israel to stand down before victory is claimed haunts me, normally you shoot for victory, and then talk. Every week, the foe boast less and less, and the UN, cringes that Israel might walk away proud, and god forbade they should do that.
CNN, for once is showing two sides of the war, perhaps they’ve come to the conclusion, better journalism requires reporting of the whole story, not one sided propaganda, we get enough of that.
My suggest for the UN observation posts, is to leave the country until after the war; they only report one side of the fighting, and that is the enemies side, so one can’t blame Israel, if indeed they are targeting UN posts. One of the reasons there is a war in Lebanon today, is because the UN’s peacekeeping force, could not, or would not, keep peace, all those years, Hezbollah was shooting rockets over the boarder from Lebanon, into Israel. Had they done their job right, they wouldn’t have to be trying to broker a peace deal that they know, and we know, they can’t keep anyhow. My suggestion is, let them fight it out, and if they get wiped, the entire world will benefit for it. Save us Americans a lot of effort doing it ourselves.
Another point is, if you really want a peace, you disarm, and Hezbollah specifically will not agree to that. They would although like time to rearm I’m sure, and is hoping for the UN to get it for them.
Hezbollah has not stepped back, they have used larger bombs, with a longer range, thus, expanding the war (in fear they may lose the war I suppose, they really didn’t want the Jews to know they had them but when push comes to shove, they just couldn’t help but use them big Syrian bombs now could they), and a good lesson for Israel, that should they stop now, you can imagine what Hezbollah has in store for them later, or had in store for them, with their new bombs.
You don’t need a ceasefire, there are ways to get in and out of the fighting zones, Israel has allowed a road for that, so the UN is full of crap, and wants Israel to silence their guns, so Syria can rearm, Hezbollah. Perhaps, Israel should take on Syria and stop the channeling of the weapons into the hands of Hezbollah: faze II of the war.

Watching Death

Like it or not, we think in line with our customs and tradition often times, right down to the level of how we think of death, or about death. I was a licensed counselor for many years, and the issue came up a few times, and I was sad at its results, to hear Americas shamefully trying to avoid talking about it. But let me put that aside and finish the article. Yes customs and traditions set down; do play a big part in how we view death. Death being a normal and natural thing; we mimic our parents and our TV heroes, and how they portray death. Why so much gloom out there on death [?] It has been around for a long time, as long as I’ve been around anyhow, fifty-seven years. It is often a taboo subject to talk bout it in certain places. But you can see a lot of books on the subject; more than I can count.

I live in Minnesota, and Peru, and I have traveled much through Mexico, Central America, and South America. The Maya, the Inca and the Aztecs took dying as a preparation period, along with rituals to be put into place; when they knew it was near; my mother was much like them. She told me about her preparing for death, three years before she died at 83, in 2003. She was looking death into its face. And just before she died she said, “I’m ready, I’m alright with it, let me go.” I was sad, but being sad only says we had good times together, that is what brought my tears, no more times. Selfish in a way; also, my mother left me with some fine last words, something TV never leaves out and parents that do not allow their children to see their dying grandparents, and so forth; on TV, or at the movies, all one can find are grunts for their disappearing heroes. That is not life.

People fear to talk about death, as if it was a storm out of control, brewing just for them. Death is seldom viewed by children in America (as I previously implied), as if it was a private affair. I seen my mother in the hospital 26-times in 23-days, when she was dying; and she was laughing and joking in her death bed. I am grateful for that time. It is a choice I feel, and I’m glad I had the deciding vote. I believe children should be allowed to visit and see their grandparents on their dying beds, should they so wish to, and even pushed a bit to do so. My son’s daughter saw her grandmother while she was dying in the hospital, and started crying, she was but a child. But what I feel she will remember is not her crying, but her great-grandmother’s smiling, for that was the last picture she saw of her.

Perhaps death is too much like hell for Americans, because most people I talk to think everyone is going to heaven, and thus, hell no longer exists. Be that as it may, hell and death seem to be connected; as my mother used to say, “Dennis, why does everyone think they’re going to heaven.” I couldn’t answer that, but now I can, hell is too close to death, and death is their nemeses.

American’s Going to Peru

I am happy that Peru has so much tourism lately; when I started coming here—seven years ago (now my 9th time), it was one plane load at a time descending at the airport in Lima, now there are three or four, within a matter of minutes; coming in from Texas, Florida and George (not to mention Europe). Peruvians love Americans, but I fear the Americans are starting to be quite rude, belligerent, and down right pigs. It is almost daily I see this now; loud and rowdy Americans in the nice outdoor restaurants, having contests with eating Ginny pigs, and eating them like a cow would hay, shoving it down and screaming to the tops of their lungs, while on lookers can’t believe their eyes; Peruvians have had a high regard for Americans, in a few more years, I think that will change.
For the most part—as I’ve already mentioned—Peruvians have a high opinion for Americans, and many wish to be in their shoes, but I don’t see this kind of behavior with other cultures coming to Peru, like Europeans, or Asians, or even South Americans visiting Peru, only Americans. It is not completely the young crowd, it is a mixture; they show indifference to those around them eating or doing whatever business they are doing.
I have written many articles on Peru, all positive, and I think this one can also be, we must, as Americans, remember, we are in another persons backyard, please act like you’d expect them to act, should they visit us.

Remembering: The Granite Man (Red Flesh Brooding Dedicated to Don Quinn)

He had 32-fights, won 22, lost 10, between l956, and l964; was picked to fight Clay but would never make it to the ring whom was a younger fighter back than D.Q.; between May of 1960 and February 1962, had won ever fight he fought, all 13-battles right in a row. In 1962 he lost two, and in ’63, he won two. He lost all three of his last fights in 1964. He was the Heavyweight Title holder. I had met him personally once at his house (perhaps twice, I only remember specifically once talking to him though, in April of 1964); we talked briefly that forenoon, a sunny Saturday, just before one of his last three fights he’d have: March, April and November would be his finality for the big time. I was at that time, sixteen years old.

Considered up to his last three fights, the roughest and toughest fighter in Minnesota, and one of the boldest in the nation, this was his claim to fame; the public clambered for him, a love and hate calmer, he was the Minnesota brawler (D.Q.). Years later he’d go to the corner bar, where I hung out, and give a little lip service to a few of my tough friends, some would back down, some wouldn’t—but all knew he was no push over, hands and a head like granite, a will of iron, and he could take a blow. He took punches as if he had whalebones; swayed with the wind and shifted back to his fighting stance.

When I had first met him with his brother-in-law, Sid—Sid being a drinking buddy of mine at the time, we went to high school together, and we hung around, he introduced me to him, his sister was married to him; his hands were as big as my head I remember.

Said Sid, “DL, he’s a nice guy, but drunk he’s a madman, punch crazy, beat up my sister, stay away from him.”

I guess his wild swings were more dangerous than his planned ones. He left a blood trail anyway, and cloudy minds wherever he fought, to include his. He was kind of a hero of mine, until Sid told me of his sister getting hit a few times. I still liked the guy, and in time I learned our neighborhood was no different than his way of thinking, and like him, we all were St. Paul, Minnesotalits.

His massive head, and blazing eyes gave men the terror, weakened their knees, prompting dread, just his name, like Mike Tyson, or Sonny Listen. Toward his last three fights, he was slipping, as they say, perhaps too much drink, not enough training, or if it was adequate, he was perhaps cracking from other things in his life: taking the iron blows to his face, skull, ribs, under his heart. He lost fights, but came back to win them also, as I said before, until the last three. People paid to see this granite man, to see the brawl, they didn’t care about a scientific fight, and the papers would pick it up as a tough mans fight.

He was a slugger, brawler, with a savage determination. He gave out punishment, and took it, haymakers missed him, and some didn’t, crushingly.

The Recuay Culture of Peru: [400 BC-800 AD—Ancash, Region]

The Recuay Culture of Peru
[400 BC-800 AD—Ancash, Region]



The Recuay Culture is one of several fairly advanced pre-Inca societies of the first millennium AD in Peru, such as the Moche and Nazca. Best known for advanced ceramic art and stone cutting, the Recuay people were farmers and herders, whom lived in the Callejón de Huaylas Valley of the northern highlands of Peru, they were contemporaneous with the Moche culture, of the neighboring northern coast. They are known for their pottery, and the basic three colors they used.
The first civilizations in Peru, date back some 13,000-years, about 1250 BC, several advanced cultures, such as the Chavín (North part of Peru), Chimú (South part of Peru), Nazca, and Tiwanaku [Bolivia], developed in several sections, or regions of Peru, and what now is Bolivia. The Inca empire united what is now known as the better part of South America, within perhaps a 50-year period, with its base in Cuzco; a totalitarian state for the most part. The Recuay civilization was an Andean society of the Classic Period.
The art of the Moche and Nazca, are quite well known throughout the world, the Recuay cultural art [pottery in particular] are perhaps equal, but less known simply because of their location, and the instability in the highlands. I have been in the highlands, and it is rough, many flood areas, much of it has to be traveled bay horse. The Wari expansion came about 750 AD, and it seems the Recuay culture dyed out some.
So little is written about this Culture of Peru, it is a shame. Some of their figurines, like the llama, and the devils are quite impressive, among their other ceramics. Very little is known of the social organization and settlements of this culture.
Ancash, a region, and part of the highlands of Northern Peru, are many sites available for the armature archeologist to enjoy himself (and mountain climbing, which I care not for). Agriculture and herding are among its better-known exchange. You will see fruits, potatoes in this high altitude society for sale also.

Recuay Heartland: communities were based around hilltop fortifications: settlements, here one had a defensive edge, and could have their ceremonial activates in some small way, in peace.
They have a distinctive artisan art style compared to their neighbors, I’ve have seen the work from almost every culture in Peru, and they have what I call a dark side to some of their work, as well as light side. Some monolith stone work, mummy and devil style; and for their period, very sophisticated. Some of the potteries are of thin oxidized past. Whitish clay is often used, I’ve seen this and handled the objects, and they are fine sculptures indeed, the white clay is known as kaolinite; they made animals, supernatural figures, again I’ve handled them, and they are unique, and one would be a prize to own.
From what I’ve seen, and I have not seen all of their stonework, or ceramics, or textiles, but much of it is I do believe, of mortuary ritual, ancestor worship, the public leaders.
The period I find most interesting in their artwork is 200 BC to 800 AD that could be considered almost their whole life existence as a culture of antiquity. But they as, many cultures have, had a transformation. There was kind of a cultural exchange shift, or pattern in northern Peru, in the North Highlands, following the Chavin’s collapse in 100 BC, and the interactions between them and Recuay. Perhaps a second one between 200-700 AD, with the Moche and in 750 AD, the Wari; thus, we can see a complexity in their societal ancient character, if we follow them from one stage to another.

—Ancash is a region located in Northern Peru, its capitol city is Huaraz, and its largest city is Chimbote. The name of the region originates from Quechua “anqash,’ meaning ‘blue.”

Israel Uninvited by Rome to the War Tribunal

Something is vitally wrong with this picture, let me draw it out some: we got a war in Lebanon as we all know, with the Lebanese government, and their allies the terrorist groups that run the country, from schools to the mosques, to the head office of the president; now we got two terrorist groups fighting Israel in the country. The meeting in Rome is to talk about how to make peace. The Arab Nations have been invited, as has the US Government officials, and the EU to attend these meetings. Amal (a Shiite organization) and Hezbollah (more well known) will both get their ass kicked, but we do see plainly, a trend here; Lebanese is not guilty free as they have begged the world to see them as; as if they had no say in the mess, when in essence they had all along these two groups working side by side for them, the very groups that have links to the rest of the world’s terrorist organizations.
But back to my main point, the world is having a party in Rome, and everyone is invited except the Host. The one throwing the party is Israel: I would think they’d invite them. But like Annan of the UN, who never cares to invite the Jews, so now Rome is picking up on that. How do you stop a war without talking to the conquerors? That is an insult, and if I were Israel, I’d notify them, the war stops when we talk, or under the conditions we’ve already laid down, not because they are talking. The EU is as worthless as the UN. We need them only because they are part of the weeds in the green grass, and without them, we’d not know haw cowardly man could be.
Maybe the international community can have the terrorist stop their target practice across the boarder long enough to save Lebanon from extermination.

Two UN’s forces are killed in Lebanon

More life is taken in the battle, there is not much more to say, I mean, the UN dead are no different to me than a Jew's death or a Lebanese death. Where your in a war zone, people die, like in Vietnam, what did they expect, a picnic. Don't shoot here, don't shoot there concept when out with Vietnam.


First of all, it is a sad case, two more people are dead in this on going war with Israel and Lebanon. Because it is a UN observer, is not of consequence to me, a death is a death, and we should not—I believe give more value to a UN death than a Lebanese or Jew. When UN observers go into harms way, in the middle of a war, what do you expect, everyone to baby-sit them, get serious, they are willingly, knowingly, walking into a deadly game. It sounds to me they don’t know who the killers are, Israel or Lebanon’s terrorist group; if it is Lebanon, then it is not an issue, its an accident, and will be forgotten soon. If it is a Jew, it is a deadly sin, and a big issue; as usually, so we shall find out soon. Chinese or Canadian, or Jew, life is life. The old story: get out of the oven, if you can’t take the heat.
War is not pleasant, and for some odd reason, the UN feels they are immune from wars deadly forces. That is why the terrorist groups run to foreign hotels, churches, and homes, along with mosques and so forth and so on, because they are off limits to Israel in a war, to for them, but for everyone else in the civilized war world. It just happens to be, today or yesterday, Israel hasn’t been playing by the world’s rules, as the terrorist group has never been playing by them, as Iran and Syria has never been.

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan [the antichrist’s assistant] is deeply distressed over this, how about over the deaths of Israel’s dead. I don’t think Annan will lose any sleep over it; he’ll go to his millionaires club, and drink a few wines, and go home. Here is a man who was responsible for many more lives in Africa, I doubt he will grieve all that much. Annan has really no idea of what is truth, and what is going on here, but he has a lot to say. He should investigate before he opens his mouth, plus, he is the spokesman for the UN, his was never given the kingship of the world body that is with the five members; but I suppose he thinks he speaks for all the members, when in essence, he speaks for whom he likes.

In the Last Days: Russia and Israel and America Crushed

Article One of Two
In The last Days


Russia and Israel: To the Death Marching

The Middle East is an oven ready to explode, I don’t have to prove that, we can see it; we see Iran playing with nukes, and Syria and Iran supplying terrorist groups. Russia looking here and there for money, its old glory, and who is in the Middle? You guessed it, Israel. I do not wish to be skeptical with a message, like so many preachers, trying to sensationalize the Biblical hour of destruction, but lets put it where it belongs, no conjecture, no footnotes, just description: we can turn to the front pages of any newspaper to see where we are headed, or we can turn to Ezekiel 38: and chapter 39, read the whole thing, you will find Russia, Moscow, marching to the Middle East.
Ask the question: who can take down Israel? China can’t, they’d lose their pants, and belt, or as they say in Peru, the Goat and the Rope. There are only two countries in the whole world that could take on Israel, the US and Russia. Europe, or even NATO, without the US assistance would be cooked alive if Israel decided to pour their might upon them. This is not boasting, I am not Jewish, nor boast, it is fact. I spent 11-years in the military. We got nukes over in Europe, but by the time we got to put them in place to use, the sake would have gobbled us up. It is just show and tell over there.
Ezekiel is the prophet in question here, as Russia is signified as Rosh, in the Bible, from whence Russians derive their name. Thus, Russia will invade the land of Israel, but be defeated. In researching this, and watching world events unfold, one need only as who is the face of Gog, and where is the land of Magog? As a result of your research, you will discover Mother Russia. The meaning of Gog, is ‘end time ruler.’ But what we discover in the bible is this: Gog’s last stand. The tips of the Caucasus Mountains are referred to as or called ‘The Gogh” We also can trade Magog to the book of Genesis Chapter 10.
I don’t want to get too much into spreading this out as far as one can, it would take a volume or two, but to make a point I must settle something. Josephus, a Jewish historian, who worked for the Romans, who lived 2000 years ago, said the Greeks called the Scythians Magog or Magogites. These are the very same people Russia gives credit for populating their land, thousands of years ago.
The bible and times, and means indicated a great conflagration in the Middle East in the last days. These are the days you and I are living in; to me they are most interesting. We can recognize these as actual or false, it doesn’t matter, I am just a little vice among many, but God’s word says so, and as I said already, so does the times and means. If it was up to me, I’d say let’s get it over with, I feel we are living in a most interesting time. Actually, there are only two times in history I’d liked to have lived, the first, would be in the beginning, when Adam and Eve were alive, the second is now, at is end.



Article Two of Two
In the Last Days


America in Prophecy: Jeremiah to Revelation
[Crushed]

Where is America in prophecy? Many folks have asked. I written (years ago on this very subject) I shall see if I can put some of it together by memory again. Review your New and Old Testaments in the Bibles: such prophets as: Isaiah, Jeremiah, and John are good to start out with.

Jeremiah said it loud and clear, and I’ve been looking at this warning for many years, and when 9/11 came, and I was in a plane from Minneapolis to LA, at 8:36 AM, and it was stopped, it made me think: “…Woe to the land shadowing with wings, which is beyond the rivers of Ethiopia: That sendeth ambassadors by the sea, even in vessels of bulrushes upon the waters, saying, Go, ye swift messengers, to a nation scattered and peeled, to a people terrible form their beginning hitherto; a nation meted out and trodden down, whose land the rivers have spoiled…”
If this doesn’t describe America, I’m not sure what other nation it could be.

Jeremiah also says in so many words [Chapter 50]: she is a nation whose…mother shall be sore confounded. Nimrod founded Babylon, so it must be America, whose mother was England, whom is far from being a superpower as it was at one time of her life. He also specifies: she dwells around water, We have the worlds two largest oceans to looked at, on each side of our country, and a river that is over 4000 miles long. He also adds: her wealth irritates the nations of the earth; jealousy is big here [Chapter 51]. I travel a lot, and I can say without hesitation, once I’m known as an American, I am looked at differently than my Peruvian wife, and now she is. Everyone thinks my wife is my translator in South America, and in Asia as well. But just being an American plagues them.

Jeremiah also points out: she tries to mount up to heaven, we’ve just found water on the moon Titan, so he got that one right, and we’ve been to Mars now. So he was talking about America I’m sure.

In Revelation, we see John as told us: she is laden with sins, she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, and her wealth has produced idleness and sin. If ever we’ve been in a state of polluted souls, we are now. Booze and drug addiction, gay rights, and abortion, godlessness all around and gambling and robbers everywhere; homosexuality, now arrogantly and blatantly going public; smut peddlers on the Internet like lice on a camel; venereal disease running ramped. Mercy killers, death with dignity; if I left something out, you can fill it in, I’m sure there is a lot more to be said.

Thus, in conclusion, the world is going to have a wake up call, and there will be a holocaust against all nations, and America is not going to be the only one free of this, as I sense, she thinks she will be. Judgment calls for it, and we can see it with all the sneak attacks going on around her, and those being stopped by the FBI and CIA. Syria has paid well its terrorist groups to put a snare in Americas coffin, as has Iran. I do not think America or Russia is going to come out of this smelling like roses, I get the feeling we both will be crushed. I see this in Ezekiel, Jeremiah and in the Book of Revelation.

Abu Omar al-Kurdi: The Kingfish Of Baghdad

Abu Omar al-Kurdi: The Kingfish Of Baghdad


By Dennis L. Siluk
Jan. 26, 2005

He’s got a long name that’s for sure, and a long list of car bombings; he’s killed his own people with, his own kind without a blink of an eye. You can rest assure there is division among the Islamic world, and hypocrisy piled as high as you can climb; he is the proof in the pudding. I would think because of such people like Saddam who forced feed them past the infancy stage, they never acquire a free thinking mind. To be quite honest, I doubt they will ever get fully over this developmental stage; I would pray they would though, and that I’m wrong. Maybe Europe knows this better than us. Anyhow, the Kingfish of Baghdad, Abu Omar al-Kurdi [for short]; and Ali for shorter, was captured. I’m sure Ali has trained a few good Islamic souls to carry on his mission from Allah. Anyhow, I got thinking of the new Iraqi government, what is due punishment for him. In America we’d put him in a cell, with a TV, some weights to lift, and feed him steak and eggs for breakfast. I hope they put him in a car, and blow it up. I’m Jewish today: an eye for an eye. As a Christian I’d put him in the lions den and walk away, and he could pray to Allah to save him; let’s see how he rates with Allah. Then I’d take a video and send it to that Islamic TV station, Letterman is always making fun of, and let them transmit it all over the Islamic world.

He was said to had been responsible for the UN attack also back in August of 2003 [?] not that it makes all that much difference; I mean, a car bomb in Baghdad, killing 1 or 10-Iraqi’s does not differ with me than killing 11 or 20 UN hot shots; although the UN staff believe it does. Blood is blood and the UN tag is not stapled on the DNA. Mothers, fathers, wives and children all cry the same.

On another note, I notice all the fat-Muslims are in fear the poor little Iraqi does will get a taste of freedom, wise up you could say, and thus, no longer able to lead him by the nose in circles. My gosh, what would life be like then.

------------

Feet that Run towards Evil [War in Lebanon: Rice’s Visit: 7/24/2006]

Feet that Run towards Evil

[War in Lebanon: Rice’s Visit: 7/24/2006] The Lebanese Government is like it’s their allies Hezbollah; they want an end to the destruction stopped on their side of the fence, but not their war on Israel. What would King David and Solomon say about this? If I remember right, Solomon killed his half brother because when he gave him a second chance, he plotted still, to take his throne, then of course he had him killed. King David, would not have waited so long, he’d have had him killed right away. So Rice’s comments today with the Lebanese Government was not too encouraging, save for the fact, she is waiting for Hezbollah to make a positive move, and everyone else is waiting for Israel to lay down and die like a nice little puppy.
Someone said, a cease-fire should come first, and then talk about the two soldiers, Hezbollah remains holding. Not sure why it can’t be the other way around, release the two soldiers, and then talk, since that was the agitator in the first place. I mean, didn’t Israel talk for two weeks before the invasion, and only afterwards did the UN get fully involved. My suggestion is, leave Israel do what they are doing, and talk after the country falls to the abyss, and then carry a big stick to the closed door, conversations they’d like to have.
We can see protesters in Beirut, making their voices heard that Washington’s voice on the subject is not to their liking, of allowing the fighting to go on. What is Washington suppose to do, tell Israel to stop, while Hezbollah bombs the hell out of them. Let’s get serious here, we are talking about a war, not a democratic election. The protesters should line up in back of the Lebanese Prime Minister’s door and pretest that their government harbors a terrorist group that is being supported by their Capitol: the Lord hates: ‘Feet that run towards evil,’ so wrote King Solomon, and Fouad Siniora and Nabih Berri do just that, as do those protesters.
Some folks quote American Tax dollars at work are killing Lebanese, and I say, Syrian and Iranian tax dollars are doing the something, killing Jews. So we have a status quo here. But of course, the media often does not see the other side of the fence, biased they can be. Deal with the reasons, and problem, it came about, not the surface situation, that is what is happening now, bombing, killing, but why?

[Israel] Israel has built a tent city in Nitzanim Beach to get away from Hezbollah rocket fire in the north, why do we not see or hear more on this with the media?
Hezbollah conceded it is losing the battles, and the south is falling as Israel is finding many rockets, taking Hazbollah’s stronghold, and thus, saving many Jewish lives for the future, but no one seems to look at it from that angle. “Israeli forces say their goal is to neutralize Hezbollah.” Hezbollah is presently trying to hit hospitals in Northern Israel [so they have to go underground]; these are the good guys the Lebanese are protesting.
[America] The other thing American’s have not mentioned, or mentioned very little, is that Hazbollah has had its evil eye on America, and has tried a number of times to do its dirty deeds. So if our tax money destroys these maggots, the entire better, and let Israel do the dirty work, or we will have to, as the CIA has in the past. Iran, being the primary supporter of this terrorist group, will continue after Israel leaves to rebuild Hazbollah’s strength, but for a while it will hurt them. Saudi has its members in that gang as well, no wonder they are trying to broker a ceasefire.

Syria Playing the Good Guy

I see Syria has opened the doors to Lebanon; they should, since they’ve put them into this predicament. If it weren’t for them, Israel would not have to protect its boarders. We seem to have hindsight there, or at least the media today. Let’s look at the whole picture when we put the cards on the table. It is like the old saying goes: cause the problem, then fixes it, and you’ll be the hero.
One of the many sad things is, world heritage sites are being hit, a curse of war, as is death, and scares afterwards. This whole area has a worldly spiritual connection.
The terrorist group has hit the university in Haifa…
The UN, is now in Beirut, and wants a stop to the fighting, but the terrorist group will not stop, so why should Israel. The UN needs to talk to Iran, Syria, and the well-fed terrorist group Hezbollah. We must not forget where it all started, Hezbollah, Syria’s ‘Red Army,’ killed three Israel soldiers, and abducted two more, and declared war, this is war: so the UN needs to point fingers where they belong!
It would seem Israel got their first foothold in the country now, good, it’s about time, now secure the area, and create a buffer, and send Syria and Iran a message, if you don’t Hazbollah will simply start all over again down the road launching more rockets.
Most of the news coming out of this crisis, is Lebanon getting hit, how about the 100-rockets the guerillas fired Saturday into northern Israel: we don’t hear much on that. To me, this is just a matter of Israel hitting back, and they just happened to have a bigger club. I am not sure why the media counts the causalities during the conflict, of war, it would be wiser to count after the war: all this does is sells more newspapers, and puts blame on the one winning the war, so pressure will be put on them to stop, so the loser can go home victorious. But for once, Israel is not listening to the bull…and Bush isn’t either.
So the count is 300-dead, and 1000-wounded, on both sides.
The other issue I have a hard time with is, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1559, calling for the disarmament of Hezbollah, in 2004, and it has not happened. Now the UN is not doing a thing about it, so guess that has to, Israel. So it tells me they passed a resolution they did not want to uphold, yet the UN seems to be taking sides here, as expected.

Imaginative Writing Vs. Writing Skills

Imaginative Writing Vs. Writing Skills


By Dennis L. Siluk
Jan. 12, 2005

I have letters, real letters I paid good money for them, one from Mary Renault [a writer of some 17-books, died I think in l984], one from Hemingway, one from Napoleon himself [1806], a note from the Senator of Paris, Victor Hugo [l840’s], and several others, you want to see bad writing, this would be enough to flip a hamburger off its grill. But you know it’s just the way life is (a part of our past generations). Someone once said, referring to the difference in imaginative writing vs. writing skills, “If I had no writing skills at all, but a good imagination, that would do in selling books, its been proven many times over; but if I had only writing skills, and no imagination, don’t try to write a book. [Something similar to that.]” Then I got thinking of some folks who write twenty paragraphs of whatever, and at the end of the whatever, say nothing. I wonder where they fit in.

I suppose it is like a handsome guy or lovely lady with no personality. Thus, it does not matter how smart one is or good looking, dead meat or spoiled meat is uneatable either way.

Ah! Yes, yes, fate seats a skeleton at every table does it not; and hissing dribbles down ones lips out of discontentment over such matters. It is to some, ‘bitter delight’ no matter what, for such to find a lovely misspelled word, or imperfect sentence: a feverish heaven of his hell, one might say. Thus misery ebbs out of his pale mind, and creates its own kind of pleasantness. Lets enjoy writing, is that not what this is all about. If need be, if it goes for a Pulitzer, we can always hire a ghost-writer. The spoken and at times broken word, when it becomes too much work, or not fun at all, who will care to write [?] Who wants to go back to school for 7-more years and learn the mine or grammar? Then come back and write for the UK [no disrespect intended, but I’d head on to ’60-minutes’]. Some of us are content being a Private in the Army, some want to be Officers, so let it flow, whatever floats the boat. The UK is like a nice red apple tree, and I like red apples, not green.

Some people that like green apples are schooled in mad desires, somewhere in their human history, their fragile past—such a shame, they never ate a red apple, or ate too many of them. In consequence, one keeps swimming in an empty gulf, when he should be resting his brain that’s over taxed; it is more of a medical condition than a syntax delight. But this is the way things are, it is easier to correct another’s grammar than to correct one’s own mind, make it healthy, which would take much longer, of course.

Where do we find such people: most likely, sitting at home across ones lamplight; weaving silence and grief—their inner light is cast out by inner shadows? These types of beings are lost at sea “Ah! Look!” There, they’re go….now all I hear is the mindless clamor of echoes, or is it the gulls.

------------

The Top Ten List of Bullies

By Dennis L. Siluk
Aug 11, 2004

If David Letterman can do it, so can I: who are the Top Ten Bullies? Not hard to find them. A lot of foreigners are saying the US Government is the number one Bully. Could they be right? They do not talk about the Top Ten givers, or freedom fighters, no: Arafat gets that Top Ten billing, number one Freedom Fighter, hailed by Hillary Clinton; and the contributions to a world starving, we feed over 500,000-million people on earth. How come there is no Top Ten here; where would the EU be or France, Germany, Russia, China be on such a list? But I want to talk about Bullies, I get off course now and then, don't I; forgive me.

Now who can we start with, how about Iran: number ten [10]; freedom of speech, just try and say what you want [Egypt can be put into that category also, and Saudi Arabia and Jordan]. How about Castro, number nine [9], there you might just as well through the "Bill of Rights," off the dock into the bay. How about the PLO, number eight [8]; if you talk to an Israeli, you're dead, if you don't put on a explosive belt, you're dead, if you put it on, you're dead, if you say the wrong word, you're dead; if you're American, you're a bully - so think and do as they say. North Korea, number seven [7], they haven't seen sunshine in 50-years, what more can I say, they control everyone's lips. Don't forget, these are bullys [within their society, and around, if not wanting the world at their feet], it takes a bully to keep a society in line. Bill Clinton number six [6], he tried to be a bully but didn't succeed. Russia, number five [5], they give and they take; imprison people for making money, and subdue those who have not catered to the Kremlin. They lost the war of will with America, and have not forgot it, they will be surfacing in the near future, and I'm sure will be a bigger billing in the Top Ten Bully list.

Civil Liberties seem to be protecting the criminals, the terrorists, they get honorary mention, for they'd like to be a bully, yet do not make the grade: their flag is flying high though.

Back to the Bully Top Ten. Number four [4], Sudan, Kenya, South Africa, the Congo, Liberia, and a half dozen more countries over there, in Africa, they are all on a power gig, to see how long they can last, how many they can rape, how much they can steal and kill. Number three the EU and the UN [they are the exclusive team now, with Germany and France leading the way], and would like to dictate to the world, and is trying through international financing and manipulation to run a new world order, yet they'd like the US to join, and be their fighting force [do their dirty work for them] as we have in the past, now with NATO, before with WWI, WWII dollars, men and machines, etc. Number two, China, the bully of Tibet, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, to mention a few. And the top dog of the day, Bin Laden with his al-Queda gangsters; he and his Muslim assistants would like to put the world in bondage - Bully Number Ten. Well, it's not what you might have expected, but it is as David Letterman would have put it, the Top Ten for the day, I can't do a thing about it.

The USA’s Supreme Court’s Diluted Laws

The USA’s Supreme Court’s Diluted Laws

I’m not out to change anyone’s mind, and I’m sure I couldn’t’ anyway, we are all a little bent on how we see things I suppose, and now the time has come for a appointee for the Supreme Court, which is the President’s constitutional right to select; and of course, to be subject to questioning by the Supreme Court judges, and Senate. I guess if I believe in anything in America—I would go with the statement a CIA Agent made recently, and I can’t remember his name, but when he asked if he worked for the President of the United States, he said, “No, I work for the ‘Constitution of the United States.”’ I couldn’t have said it any better.

Having said that, I look at all this fuss going on about President Bush’s selection for the Supreme Court; of course everyone on the left, or let’s say, those for Abortion Rights, are worried about Bush’s candidate; to the point, they are looking at religion; and they should be warned, they could be trespassing on his First Amendment rights of the candidate. I mean, does Bush have to select an atheist to appease the Democrats? I hope not; like Clinton, a president has the right to select any one he wants, providing he is qualified. If Bush’s appointee claimed to be pro abortion, this dispute would not be forthcoming by the left. This could turn into a Civil Rights dispute I dread, somewhere down this slanted line; should this continue.

But we are of course looking at Roe Vs. Wade, are we not? The Supreme Court decided on January 22, l973 to endorse, or however you want to put it, but I say, “Give” Federal Constitutional Protection to women who wish to have an abortion. Which they say is the law of the land I guess now (which I believe is really unconstitutional); now let me jump ahead a bit, and come back to this.

Under the Constitution, Article II, Section II, the president has this right to select whom he pleases. I am not sure what constitutional right the Supreme Court Judges upheld in Roe V. Wade; and I think Mr. Roberts sees it that way also. I mean the First Amendment deals with the freedom of religion, and speech, and freedom for the Press, which is being violated at this very moment, by holding a certain newspaper lady behind bars for not disclosing her source of information. But the point I’m getting at is the law of the land, the Constitution does not produce such a freedom. It may be a woman’s right, but not a Constitutional Right according to the United States Constitution; the Supreme Court makes that up; they know it, and so does the left, and that is where the fear comes in I’d say.

Now let’s take this to another level. Why did the Supreme Court even make such a diluted law, or judgment? Simple, because under Amendment’s V and VI, an abortion would normally fall under a ‘Capital Crime,’ or “Infamous Crimes”; and thus, the judgment wipes away any criminal prosecutions that might emerge from a woman having an abortion. In essence, the law of the land was modified to accommodate abortions, which it was never meant to do.


What bothers me is, if we can do that to our precious Constitution, if nine-judges can alter the most precious document an American has, what they can not do! God help us all.

How grateful should Israel be to terrorists?

How grateful should Israel be to terrorists?
[7/22/2006]

How grateful we should be to the poor terrorists who deserve who invaded countries in the name of Allah. How justified they are to continue with their killings and so forth, so I’ve heard, somewhere along the line. Let me put my view in focus, of course it can’t be right, I mean, an American going against the UN, we are always wrong aren’t we. It’s the new breed out there; the ones that suck America dry, and slap her in the face.
They all want their rights with no responsibility; I do believe, if Islam could, they would, invade America, and are trying in South America, they’ve even got a weasel in the congress in Peru. They couldn’t alter the recent elections and that really bothered them, now they got to work on Allen Garcia and see if He’ll be as easy as his running mate.
America and England are in Iraq, but yet the terrorists are hitting all over the world. What is really the message here? I think it is, ‘We can, and we will,’ as simple as that. It has always been that way. And if we did not help Israel, the Arabs would exterminate them like Hitler tried; it is their big desire, there high if you will. We have a lot of Jew haters around, not sure why, but they are like cockroaches, they can be found in any dirty hole.
In any case, the Arab world would not allow, or even think of having a fair fight with Israel, as we have seen in their past history—they tired to exterminate them in 1948-49; again in 1967, and again in 1972; it would not be a one on one. It would be a gang fight against one, as it always has been, and the United Nations would back it up and laugh all the way from New York City to Vienna [and we give them $21-billion dollars a year, and they want more].
The new trouble in Lebanon is no different than the war on terror, as President Bush has pointed out, it is only the fact, it is Jews fighting Arabs; as it always has been. And the UN wants to make sure the Arabs get their needs and rights, and point out the rules of war, as if there was only party involved here. Israel perhaps has one of the best air forces in the world, let them use it here and let it be written in history, they shoved all the boasting surprises by its foe down its throat. I hate a one sided fight. I once was in such a fight, and you get pushed here and there, and everyone seems to think the loner deserves it, but put him or her face-to-face, one on one, and they are all mouth. This is the case here, today in Lebanon. Leave the folks fight it out, why get involved, they started it, why should we jump on Lebanon’s side and say: gee, those bad Jews are sure over doing this little game. Everyone’s afraid Israel might win, and then what—Peace? God forbid.


------------

Israel and Hezbollah at War [7/20/2006]

This is the 10th Day Israel has been hitting Lebanon with rockets and so forth, and the Hezbollah guerrillas are getting their surprise a little quicker than they planned, last time I heard, Hazbollah’s mighty man was going to give his surprises to Israel, we are all still waiting. The boarder is getting tighter and Lebanon’s president has warned Israel not to invade Lebanon, perhaps they should tell that to Hezbollah. It tells me one thing, they want Hezbollah there to shoot across their boarder into Israel, and call it a safe zone for the terrorist group. If Hezbollah is having a hell of a time fighting Israel, the Lebanon army will be wiped out in less than a heart beat, if I was the president, I’d not send my troops to be whipped like little puppies, lest he want to sleep tonight with no Army when he wakes up.

Israeli Gen. Shuki Shachar has not said what his intentions are about an invasion; perhaps another 10-days of bombing will sort that out, but if Lebanon wants to fight Israel over a terrorist group, they are no better than the terrorist group themselves. I don’t think the status quo, or cease-fire will do much good, so Israel, finish the job this time. The President of Lebanon says, "We are not going to let anybody take our land. We are not going to let them come back and take it," when in essence, the terrorist group has already taken it. I never can figure out if they really think the world is so dumb or what. But then Hitler said: “It is easier to fool the masses than one individual.” Perhaps he was right.

Hezbollah hit the United Nations’s observation post and of course the UN blamed it on Israel, how anti Jew can you be. They create a smoke screen so they don’t have to reprimand Hezbollah: that is why the Jews don’t want the EU or UN over in their backyard snooping around, they are up to no good. This is the first time in a long time I’ve seen the media do fairly good reports on the military operations with all involved, usually they, like the UN and EU, and Middle Eastern Arab countries are always slanting their biases, to hurt Israel, and claiming like the UN, it is all the Jew’s fault.

Hassan Nasrallah is a bit embarrassed he is getting his ass kicked, I suppose with his big mouth the way it is, I’d be ashamed of my operations also.

The Globalist: the New Breed

The globalist’s are the new breed, the new generation if that is what I can call it. The new internationalist might be better. They all think they will find salvation in humanism, or in man himself. I say good luck chumps. Globalism has planted these seed a generation ago, or so, maybe longer, but they started sprouting a generation ago. It calls for the control by governments by a government, to control our wealth, resources; as the United Nations would like to have done, had Kerry made it as President; internationalize the US to their liking. The wealth and resources are somewhat control anyhow, the internationalist have been busy.

It is hard in a way to pin-point the enemy exactly, but terrorism has re-focused us not to pay attention to this emerging dilemma. We are slowly all being fenced in, like it or not; like in a concentration camp. If you can’t feel it, you’re too busy with other crap. It is mixed with psychological intimidation that is a way in capturing without hogtying a person, country, and eventually the world.

I am still on the premise of Globalism [Globalization]; I will get into the conspiracy in a moment. We have a few of them going on: Globalism is one in itself, the other is our children.

As I was about to say, I could not have said this 40-years ago, it wasn’t so noticeable I suppose, and I was too young to give a sh…t. But it is so obvious now, if you can’t see it, you are blind, or want to be. I love America, but I’d not raise my kids here any longer, should I have one now, and I do not intend in having one. Nor is this any longer a place to retire, it is although a place to make money. That is not cutting down America, for I spent 11-years in the military, it is telling the truth. The American family structure produces mentally ill children, starting at the age of five. We can give thanks to our legislatures for most of that, and some to the parents, and drugs, and fast pace of our life style, and the no-god syndrome we have going on now.

Teachers are a big blame for this; the ungodly creatures, I’d take my kid to a private school nowadays, should I be forced to raise a child in America. But can I blame the teachers all that much? When we got Activist Judges that should have half the blame, and who do you think makes up the criteria for the schools, it is the Behavioral Psychologists, not the education system, lest you want to remain fooled like the many.

Patriotism has its new obstacles, as the global network takes control. We can see, and are being taught: global perspective; global family settings; global responsibility; global citizenship, and evolutionary education, we are being herded like cows.

Humanism is merely, Marxism, with a new face on it; it denies God, as Europe and the United Nations has done so plainly. Feminism is the last corner in the box of humanism to be cultivated. In our public schools, the truth of the matter is, the humanist manifesto is the key word, regardless of grade.

We as Americans have been under attack for a long time, because of our constitution, for it was made to protect the people and to give certain rights to the government that the people want the government to have, not like Iran, Saudi Arabia, the new EU constitution, etc. That is why we are under attack. We have freedoms, and this does not lay good with the humanist view. Our free enterprise system is under attack, as are our values.

When people are in despair, it is most easy to control them; like they do in the Middle East. They want to hang on to power at any cost.

In l975, the University of Nevada, James H. Lincoln, drafted up a document to be used in the future called, “Model Statue for Termination of Parental Rights.” Although the model in itself dates back some one hundred years, or the concept; in November, l976, it was reviewed by the Juvenile Justice System. Now call it what you will, but the proof is in the pudding. You ask, “Where is the conspiracy?” Just look around.

United Nations #60: Hezbollah, Annan’s Puppy

United Nations #60: Hezbollah, Annan’s Puppy
[Annan: Assistant to the Antichrist]

Annan, this guy I’ve said it a hundred times, and he never fails to come through with his satanic ways (and prodigious hatred for the Jews), is surely a link to the Antichrist’s way of thinking. He is the worse General Secretary the world has ever had. And I do not need to research my fifty-nine other articles on the United Nations I did to give you a layout of his misdeeds, and his murderous ways, from Africa to and through the Middle East, but it would take a longer letter than this, but believe me, he has his sins to account for and will in hell.
As we all know we have a battle going on in Lebanon, which Lebanon started, funded by Syria and Iran, and delivered to Israel by Hezbollah, Lebanon’s turret group, the other side of Hamas, or PLO, they are all the same, cut out of the same pie.
Again Annan feels Israel should lay down their advantage in battlements and let Hezbollah alone, so they can rebuild rest and recuperate to kill more Jews. Annan is the cause of more lost life in the Middle East, Israel, and Africa than Pol Pot was in Cambodia. We have a Secretary General that thinks he is the new Emperor of the New World Order; perhaps he is the deadly prophet, assistant to the Antichrist.
The US has not kindly taken to allowing the UN or the EU to pressure Israel with their pacifism; it is not a good road to peace, thus they have given Israel a green light, and Israel should take it with full motivation. The diplomatic virus coming out of the UN is only their old age illness of anti Zionism showing. The way I look at it is, Israel should take zero tolerance with Hezbollah, and drive them into the Red Sea; given time, they can do it, then talk peace.

Brussels wants to Kill More Jews!!

Brussels: Kill More Jews!!


BRUSSELS, Belgium -- The European Union as usual, would like to see Israel lay down and die. There is no such thing as disproportionate force in war. You use the amount it takes to win: actually a smart general would use overwhelming odds, President Eisenhower did.
Israel, didn’t tell Brussels they used disproportionate force when they went into Bosnia? There is always a turkey behind such gobbledygook. They tell Israel to cool it after Hezbollah hits and runs, like Hamas.
Lebanon is of course not innocent in all this, how can they be, they say: we are against civilian attacks, but it seems only when it is not Jewish. They don’t cry about Jews dying; only Arabs, so Israel will lower its defense so Hezbollah can regroup. They fear this terrorist group will be obliterated. Thus, Israel, hurry up and blast them into the Red Sea. And tell Satan’s group, the EU to beat it.
Jordan and Egypt are a little upset, Hezbollah is getting their ass kicked, and are scorning Israel for winning the battle. If they were losing, the world would shut up. I hope Egypt gets their ass kicked again, and Jordan as well, Israel did it before and can again. You would think they’ve learned their lesson. Iran and Syria are of course the main causes of the conflict, this would be a good time for Israel to blast Irons reactors, and invade Syria. Get it all done at once.
They got the US and Canada on there side, and may not forever, because things change over night. Russia is taking a back seat in this conflict, good for those hypocrites. I kind of hope Hezbollah don’t release the prisoners right away; give Israel a reason to wipe out all the dead crap in Lebanon to the Red Sea.
Israel must remember, the EU and UN are not on their side, it is the US that is, and since they got an open door, it is very important to make the strongest military campaign they can on this escalating mission. If every Jew was killed but one in Israel, the EU and UN still would not justify their actions, against any amount of Arab forces. The EU is a weak military force that Israel could wipe out overnight, should the US leave Europe and therefore Israel has no worry about reprisals, only trade; but who you going to trade with if your dead.
France like always is the unclear clown in the background, trying to be the trump card for the Islamic World. Again their Foreign Minister sees only one side of the fence, the bad guys. Trying to chum up with the Arabs so they don’t hit the big tower down the street, the one they’ve tried to hit in the past. Germany seems to be keeping an open mind today on the matter, what happened to the great two-some.
Lebanon is crying it is not their fault they allow the terrorist group into their congress, into their schools and into their mosques, and into their military; and should not suffer the consequences; first of all this is the most sappiest statement I’ve ever heard. That means, Israel should stretch out and die? If the police down my block cannot protect me from a killer, I got a 38 special that will.

Japan’s Rage for Pyongyang

Japan’s Rage for Pyongyang
[7/12/2006]


Pacifism vs. pre-emptive strikes—all I’d need to do if I was a Japanese person, after this most recent act of aggression by North Korea by sending over a missile towards their homeland, is remember Kiewit; like the old American saying goes: “Remember the Alamo,” that would wake me up. Hell with the nice words of ‘let’s negotiate,’ when there is nothing to negotiate but prepare: you bomb me, I bomb you, now it’s time to talk.
The first thing I’d do would be to write a new constitution, and not with American interest involved, that would come second or third. If you allow someone to take your interests into account in battle, you will fall short (and North Korea has declared war on Japan, like it or not; if the US was not present, Japan would be long gone); they will always look at their self-interest first. And the US is stepping back from the Asia recreantly. I’d not let China or anyone remind me of my [Japan’s] wartime march and/or brutalism in WWII, it was a bad war, but all wars are bad, I’d reminded the world China tried to exterminate Tibet, and still has a horrid prison record for its people. And North Korea is starving their people alive, to build a nuclear arsenal, while they want South Korea and Japan to buy their bread. And America does not have a very good record in Vietnam or Iraq, so let’s put all the pointing of fingers aside, we are all guilty of wartime crimes; what I see is the Japanese people, like the South Korean people, have gotten soft, and do not want to take the time or effort to build a forces to naturalize their enemy. The old saying goes, let them take charge of your life, and they will.
I’d add a few cruse missiles to my newfound arsenal, and aim them at North Korea, and China, should she decide to be the bully, either country would think twice, especially the North. Bury WWII, it is old news; we are in a New World Order, and if Japan does not change, it will be left behind, and China and North Korea will be holding the aces, and blackmail her into submission.
The majority of Japanese folks did not like the crisis of the firing of the missiles; while 10% didn’t care, but I suppose they were Chinese or Korean citizens living in Japan, because I can’t figure out anyone who would like such a threat as a rocket being sent over towards their homeland, or near it, and not say a word.

Israel, the World and the Hounds of Damascus

Israel, the World and the Hounds of Damascus
[7/18/2006]

Reference is made to the new crisis along the boarder of Israel and Lebanon: I do realize Israel has to pay attention to world opinion, even if it is always wrong, and against them, be it from the EU or UN, especially, who have no joy in supporting Israel, only after pressure from the US. But they are going to have to stop playing the Hezbollah and Hamas games and get down to business.
We all know the world will criticize Israel no matter what, I mean, they’d like to see them underground, like Hama’s has said right along, and like Syria and Iran have done for fifty years. I think Iran gives them 500-million dollars a year to see how many Jews they can kill a day. My solution to the problem is the same as Sarah Benchetrit, 57 who was hospitalized because of Hazbollah’s rockets, she says, “We should wipe Hazbollah off the map without pity and without listening to criticism from the rest of the world.” Sarah I agree with you 100%, but I’d even take this a little farther: I’d wipe out Damascus and Tehran also, in the process, where Hazbollah received there 12,000-rockets, and get their money. If you are going to kill a snake you don’t grab him by the tail, rather, you cut his head off; I know this works, I’ve done it in Alabama, back in 1978. Funny, the body still moves, but it is teeth less.
Lebanon must stomach the responsibility of harboring Hezbollah, like it or not. And if Hazbollah wants to hide in the city among the so called innocent, the so called innocent better get out their guns and shoot them, or if I was Israel, I’d not put my soldiers in harms way because citizens are allowing them to sleep in their houses. If a robber was in my house, I’d not hesitate, and that is exactly what Hazbollah is. You can’t expect Hazbollah to move on its own, they are getting paid to cause chaos for Israel, as Iran builds it nuclear capability, and Syria digs in for the long run.
Hassan Nasrallah promised more surprises, for Israel, that is a deadly threat, thus, I’d give them one long wakeup call, 24-hours a day until their underground bunkers collapse on top of them. You fight fire with fire. I don’t believe the issue is with Israel winning the war, rather listening to world opinion—don’t. This is the time now to blow the hell out of them, before the world forgets who started the war, and they all cry to the UN, and the UN puts pressure on the US, and the US has to demand Israel take some more crap from the Hounds of Damascus, lest they lose their $4-billion dollars a year.

Selected Articles on the United Nations, in our Time by: D.L. Siluk

Criminal Trials For The United Nations And The European Union [Part 1]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Sept. 13, 2004

It has been my belief for a long time [and so I have stated it in articles and books] the United Nations [UN] and the European Union [EU], should be brought up for charges by the United States, if only to show the people of the United States the criminal charges and enabling they do for terrorism around the world, and the robbing of our treasury. The fraud they do the tax paying people of the United Status is a mortal sin. I do not say this lightly, these robbers at the United Nation's are a prying, envious, and jealous people of the third world majority, and it has worsen in the past twenty years to a point one has to be blind not to see it; from the Carter Administration through the Clinton, both advocates to this dilemma [and it goes back much farther]; Carter unknowingly, and Clinton and Hillary more than willing for some odd reason to allow the treasury to be used by the UN and EU for their piggy pay expenses.

The assistance they give to the PLO with our money for weapons, is one of many crimes, as they reject money Israel wants for roads. By every means possible the UN assisted Saddam Hussein "Oil for Food," while the third world geezers stuffed their own pockets, and allowed the Iraqi people to suffer [As France and Germany hollowed over their contract losses].

The UN-secretary general is as anti-American as bin Laden, and has in my eyes assisted in the terrorist net-work, and he uses his half-witted power to drain the United States treasure for his own purposes, and his third world friends. That is why the world is hoping Kerry wins; Bush will not allow this to go on. Kerry like Clinton will allow the rape to continue. They have robbed, raided, and drained the United States Treasury for their expenses; they think our treasure is a common storage place or their diets, and it is their job to direct our funds.

The UN and EU are the most morally corrupt deck of cards the globe has yet to create; far more cleaver than China and Russia. And are open enemies to us, we see this on a daily bases, grabbing every opportunity to assault us. Matter of fact, had we not spent so much time trying to pacify the UN and EU in the beginning of talks about war with Iraq, we would not have lost as many lives as we have now. But they do not care about America's dead, only about two- goofballs from France, who tried to soak their pickets with money, and are begging the United States to stop the war machine and let the Iraqis kill a few more Americans so they can get the two French men home, so the terrorist can go kidnap some more, and play the cycle for as long as it is playable. This strategy, that allowed them to have more time to regroup, killed our sons and daughters. And the Financial [FT] Times, has some stupid count down to a 1000-count of dead, how unprofessional - if not morbid; and in a column they wrote a few days ago, some columnist: stated withdrawing troops should start now. I'd like to invite that columnist to go live in Iraq [I might even consider paying his way, one way to, not back - to Iraq], once we withdraw all our troops [should it be soon]; you see he is most likely sitting in some fat leather chair in the FT office, safe as a honey bee, but go to war, moron and see what it is like.

The EU and UN should be on trail by the US courts for all the criminal charges that are linger out there. If you want specifics, and don't believe I don't have them, I just do not have space in this article to plant them, and all those saying "He's full of it," you should do some home work and see how full of it we all are by allowing this to continue. The fact is, we never did have any friends out there, and we all seem to be saying: "Look at all the friends we lost," we lost nothing we never had any that we never did pay for. And let me add a rock-hard note to this - beware: we owe them nothing, exactly, nothing, we pay for their defenses, not them paying for ours, and we best start using our treasure for our own security. Europe says they do not want our leadership, fine, let them have their own, and let them finance it. [Part II, Specifics, if I can find the energy.]

------------


Kofi Annan; The Assistant To The Antichrist [2]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Sept. 14, 2004

[Real differences with the US vs. the EU and UN]

For you poets out there you might appreciate the old poem by Mary Howitt [a part of it anyway] called: "The Spider and the Fly":

"Will you walk into my parlor?" said the spider to the fly...
Up jumped the cunning spider, and fiercely held her fast.
He dragged her up his winding stair, into his dismal den,
Within his little parlor; but she ne'er came out again!"

Instead of me writing all I'm going to write, the little poem, or part of the poem sums up the UN and EU vs. the US. We have big differences; the UN and EU, vs. the United States and Kofi Annan the UN-secretary-general along with France [Mr. Chirac] know this. And it is imperative we do not leave our national security in their hands, in their greedy little third-world hands, in Europe's old Europe pockets. They want international relations to control our US Military and treasure, like in the Carter and Clinton eras. And when George W. Bush took office thank God he called a stop to it. The United Nations [UN] has lost its purpose, which was to settle disputes peacefully, not to supply the PLO or other countries with weapons for terrorism; consequently I feel they have lost their usefulness completely. It is not hard to see the UN and EU are not on the same road we are on, but want to control our road, none the less.

Security Counsel: the highest force on earth it has been called, for peace, and now all they are is bent on hogtying the United States, trying to get us to ask permission to go to war. The UN does not believe in "preempting terrorist," their policy is "hit after the fact" G. W. Bush, and his Flyboy-father of WWII know, you do not want to be hit first, like Clinton allowed on his watch as president. Had he taken action, 9/11 would have never occurred - it took time to prepare, had he taken action sooner it would not have occurred. The EU and UN want to take the "surprise," away from our military as to warn them before we get them, as we did with the five months delay in the Iraqi war, which caused many lives, not French or German lives, but American lives. Had we attacked as Bush said, we would not have given the enemy the time to set of their strategy. But France being one of the five permanent members on the Security Counsel insisted, and Germany being one of the 15-members in the rotating members, objected. And so do the French send flowers to the mothers of the dead American soldiers? No, they are only concerned about the French. Why are democracies subject to the Security Counsel, and all other countries not. As the UN and EU are talking terrorism, only the US is fighting it.

Hezbollah: Like the PLO, Hamas and al-Qaeda, Hezbollah is simply another terrorist group, but this one is interesting, it fly's the "UN" flag besides its flag which has an AK-47, Russian Rifle. So who is supporting who, the UN is supporting terrorism. Or so it looks.

The Assistant to the Antichrist: Annan is what I consider the birth pain of the Antichrist. He is for nuclear proliferation, looks the other way anyway, which to me means exactly that. He is best of friends with Arafat, the Godfather of terrorism; he and Hillary are two peas-in a pod. He wants the US to abide by the Geneva Convention, which the rest of the world violates at will, and he again looks the other way, and he says nothing. He is worse than the Nazis, and uses the UN flag to cover up all his misdealing. Mr. Kofi Annan has been around for a while [l997] as the head man at the UN, the king of kings he thinks he is, on the devils watch. If he gets the Nobel Peace Prize, God help us all. Mr. Bill Clinton loves him and would like to see him get it, probably because he was too lazy to get involved in world affairs, and let him run the show. Matter of fact, he made Clinton have American Soldiers in Eastern Europe take off their patches and put UN patches, and blue helmets. He tore the soldiers apart, and Veterans have not forgotten that. Clinton even signed the ICC agreement, but it didn't pass and Bush threw it in the garbage can where it belongs. That would have made all Americans subject to the World Court, and boy would the third-world love that, and Annan, and France, and China, and Russia - and lets not forget Kerry.

The terrorist groups: Hezbollah, Hamas, PLO, Islamic Jihad, Al-Agsa [PLO], Martyrs Brigade, all friends to the UN, and who supports them? Annan. How? With American money, by checks given to them, $25,000-checks [through our friends, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia], and UN funded money.

In a like manner, is it not funny that Russia and China combined pay less than $35- million dollars to support the UN, and the United States pays 7-billion [22%] of its annual income. And those 17,000-employes of the UN get a salary totaling 1-billion. Now who is paying this: American tax payers, mostly?

Mary Robinson, like Hillary Clinton both believe the PLO's cause is just, and therefore, so is suicide bombers, and therefore, so is the $25,000 dollars they are giving to the families that lose a lost one. We have so many forces working against us, our own kind, plus our friends, so called friends it's hard to tell the good guys from the bad guys. But the good guys are not in the EU or UN; actually they have both lost their usefulness as far as I can see.

Iraq. I want to repeat myself a bit. Iraq, because of the delay of our war in Iraq - delay of five months due to Germany, France and the UN [and after Iraq violated the UN rules for the 18th time], because of this it allowed the enemy, the insurgency in Iraq to develop. That is right next to saying, and I firmly believe it, Germany and France killed our American boys in uniform, put them in their coffins - put them in harms way. Had we went to war, and not warned them, given them time, which no Army should [surprise and deception, is a virtue for an Army at war, and hitting them in their weak area] we would not have the Financial Times exploding the 1000th soldier dead in Iraq. Many things are forgivable but this is down right savagery.

France is so prancing around as if it is a world power and Germany is piggybacking them. Listen up, little Israel could take over all of Europe tomorrow should the United States evacuate and look the other way, and we should leave Europe, we spend 40-billion dollars on their defense, and it does us no good, it is of no value anymore. While they build their economies, we support their defenses. We should shut down the UN and NATO tomorrow, and save a bundle of money, and use it where it is needed, in Iraq; I do believe the people in Iraq and Afghanistan would appreciate it better. Mr. Annan would go crazy though. Everyone thinks if Bush stays in office we will have another war. Listen up, we are at war, and it is because of such people as Carter and Clinton. They gave the world a message that the United States was for sale at a cheep price, and people like Mr. Annan grabbed the opportunity, as did the ruling elements of the UN which just happens to be the third-world countries now.

The General Assembly: is a worthless, toothless 191-member assembly at the United Nations that get fed and put to sleep every night on American dollars, and does nothing. Russia knows this and so does the CIA. They don't even know what their countries want, and vote like our emotional biased judges here in Minnesota, activist judges, and now we got activist UN members.

Clinton: I keep coming back to him and Annan because along with Arafat, they are the world's three stooges. That is to say, they play the role, but are smart not to let on to the world stage their cleverness; Clinton, if I was him, I'd not sleep a night the rest of my life for killing all our American boys. Yes, he is responsible, he did nothing when the WTC was bombed in l993, and nothing when the Saudi Tower was hit in l996; and nothing when our embassy was hit in Africa in 2000. And had a chance to kill bin Laden, and called off the raid after mulling over it for hours on end. And then he handed Haiti and Kosovo over to the UN, with American troops under them. He did very little when the USS Cole was attacked. What was this guy thinking? He was looking for the UN flag I think; what a president. Should Kerry get in, we will have the third president who feels the UN is our savior, and we may possible not recover this time.

Torture: a note on our enemy, our used to be enemy, Iraq. The UN, Annan, forgot to mention the abuse, torture and down right murder of Americans in the Iraqi war - American Prisoners; he only picks our dirty linens and shows them to the world. We were wrong to torture the people, but the Iraqi soldiers did not play chess with the Americans either, or bring them McDonalds. And had I been there and seen what they did to my fellow comrades, I might have gone a little crazy and did the same thing. I hope I would not have, but under stress one does not always play by the rules, as Mr. Annan would like Israel and America to do.

Inclosing, let's hope the UN does not take over the Internet, for they are having a meeting on that very subject soon; also,let me say the UN secretary General is not for America, and neither is the EU, and we've always knew Russia and China wasn't, that hasn't changed either. We really do not need a UN that doesn't function, or EU that at every corner is trying to bring us to our knees. Let them go and disband NATO. This is not isolationism; it is getting our priorities back into focus. We will never please these people unless we allow them to rape us, and when they do, they will herd us around like cows.

------------




United Nations Part 3; Secrets [Allies And Our Dear Friends]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Sept. 15, 2004

Had a guy write me today, he was upset I wrote about our dear and noble United Nations the way I did [I told him I hadn't even started], didn't know crap about what was going on is the reality of it; he thought I shouldn't know, because he didn't know; what an uninformed goofball. I told him to go take some time and check it out, then come back and tell me what is and what isn't the truth; he's too lazy to do the work, just the mouthing off - figures so. But you know, the UN knows most Americans like this goofball is uninformed, and that is exactly what they prey on.

This is my 3rd article related to our Allies and the United Nations. And I hope my last. I think it was yesterday [9/12/04] North Korea had a blast, people think it was nuclear. It wouldn't surprise me. Maybe my email friend knows about this, maybe not. When I was in Vietnam, they blew up a huge Ammo Dump, and when they hit it perfect, it shook the whole peninsula, and threw me six feet in the air, and there was a mushroom above my head. So I think this will fit into the premise of my article.

It has been predicted at he Pentagon that between 2008-2015, we will be attacked [go to nuclear war] with China. That they will have the capability to do so; they should have they stole it from us. I do believe our friends and foes, allies want to bring the USA down to its knees, if I am wrong, then why is all this happening, I shall explain. If I write any more articles on this subject, I might just as well write a book on it. Anyhow...

There is so much greed out there that our allies lost the motive for ethics, principles and loyalty; now having said that I want to present a few facts, and I hope the deadhead, the goofball is reading this:

1) What weapons are being used by the Iraqi insurgents to kill our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan? Does my email friend know? How about French, German and Russian made weapons, if you don't believe me, go check it out.

2) How does al Qaeda get their arms? The CIA says: China, for one.

3) The EU supplies arms to: Iran, Syria and North Korea [terrorist nations]. And Eric Linder, that is not what you call Bull-sh**, it is fact.

*

Point: we should all know by now [but I doubt Eric does], France and Russia were cooperating with Saddam up unto the day the war broke out, and which I talked about in the second article on these less than loyal friends that, Saddam exploited with the UN's knowledge, the "Oil for Food," program. Matter of fact, they filled their pockets with payoff money close to 5-billon dollars from Iraq. And Iraq got close to 6-billion from pumping oil into Syria and Lebanon illegally, how else could Saddam buy 48 - palaces? Not by collecting taxes, no one has a job over there but his henchmen.

Point: The big three arms suppliers are Russia, China and France, in the world of supplying Iraq. They supplied them with 12- different armaments. France with 120,000 items. China about 400,000 items, and Russia, how about 13-million. These armaments are killing American soldiers. And the UN knows about it Eric, check it out. Actually 17-countries are supplying the culprits, our so-called friends.

Iran, Libya, Syria and North Korea received a large amount of assistance from guess who: our friends, Germany and France. So the bullets in the heads of our sons and daughters came from our friends.

The United Nations gave Iraq 12-years of appeasement, which did nothing to stop the floating in of weapons, and oil for weapons. Kofi Annan is the Assistant to the Antichrist to blame for this. Iraq skimmed about 6-billion through this oil smuggling gimmick, and five billion kickbacks for the UN. Eric's choice, the UN, he can not believe they'd do such a think, or else he thinks the rest of the world is as misinformed as he is. It was not "Food for Oil," but rather, "Food for Palaces and weapons."

Syria continues to seek CW

Syria has a stockpile of nerve agents sarin in Damascus, and are working with the Russians with it.

Western European countries are a main source for missile training for North Korea.

The next attack on the United States will most likely be with WMD, and to be honest I didn't have to read any reports on this to figure it out, but that is what the CIA figures, and I think they are doing a good job, and not getting any credit, as even is the FBI. Bush and his team. When it comes Eric, you can say: he told me so, of course it will be to late.

After the war settled down in Afghanistan, General Franks disclosed to the United States Government [if anyone was listening] al Queda was developing deadly chemicals, biological and nuclear weapons, thus, they found the paper trail, and guess what, the Islamic terrorist have them now.

Cuba has nuclear Energy source.

Iran-Russia is under missile developmental stages.

China is selling Iran Chemical weapons [2004]; or was they may have stopped since we have discovered it. But after they stole our technological nuclear launch capability, they sold it to Pakistan, as we now know; they have it, and have threatened India with it.

Germany is selling Iran military aircraft.

The UN allows Libya to violate sanctions by buying computer parts in Europe.

Belarus Arms being sold to Iran. Wake up Eric wake up before it is too late, and all those folks out there like you. I hope Bush gets in, but whom ever makes it, I hope is vigilant enough to see this needless UN and EU on our backs, we should be tired of carrying them.

*

Secrets of the Arms Selling

Somehow I think I do not know any secrets, if I know them, they are available to be found. But after I research these things out, I'm always surprised, and think: gee, it was a secret; up to the day I found it out it seemed so. Now before I get into this area I need to clarify something: I know and you know, the US is the biggest sales of arms in the world, we sell about 40-billion worth of arms a year, compared to Russia and France, who sell about $30-billion together, and Germany and England who sell about $10-billion combined, thus we sell about the same as the top four-arms seller I grant you that. But we sell it to our friends, our allies, not the terrorist, that is the big difference, and Europe will suffer for that, for the terrorist will use what the bought from them, on them. They have tired already to use poison on them, and failed, they may not next time.

It was right when Mr. Rumsfeld implied, it was not time to relax on this war called "terrorism."

And it was right when Zebari, an Iraqi Kurd addressed the UN and told them they had failed to provide peace and security, that is why the US had to step in; had it been for the UN to continue, Afghanistan would still be under the terrorist rulership, as would Iraq. If the world cannot turn to the UN who else, surely not the EU, they can be conquered overnight by Israel, they play the superpower role, but are far from one.

I'm surprised [Israel] takes so much crap from the PLO, if I was Sharon; I'd drive the terrorist right to the Red Sea. When three countries attack one country, l967-l972, and you win the war, just like in any other country, the land you conquered, is yours. But for some odd reason, the UN feels along with others, it is their gift to the PLO to give. And why should we support them, because they are terrorist that is why. If Russia tried to take Alaska away, we'd fight. If France tried to take everything back west of the Mississippi, we'd fight. If England tired to take back the 13-colonies, we'd fight. So why is Israel any different? Three bullies tried to whip Israel, and lost, it is booty. The land we are talking about does not belong to the EU, or UN or US, it belongs to Israel. And to be quite frank, Israel has a lot more hidden weapons than humanity knows about, and I dare say, enough to fight even Russia, if need be. And they will have to soon, and are getting prepared. Like Taiwan, China will try to take it, and Taiwan needs to get some assistance in the near future or be like Tibet, sink into a gofer holes and get sucked out by the Chinese and killed like mongooses would.

*

I also know some are going to say: "Well, America in the l980's sold or gave weapons to Iraq to fight against Iran." And they'd be right. And so we did some stupid stuff ourselves, but this is the 21st Century, and things area more critical. We cannot afford to sell to our enemies, or Islamic countries. It should also be noted, a lot of money going to the terrorist comes from drug trafficking. And the future is a bit bleak, I'd say, with al-Qaeda having poison gases ready now to use will use them soon, and cyanides - poisons for food and water, will be used; also, mustard and nerve gas, ricin; they have it all available, it is just: when, where and how.

Closing Statement: Islam has never been told, "salvation and the pleasures of paradise" do not go hand in hand; one belongs to God, the other to Satan. This they will find out when they wake up from their suicide bombings, wakeup to find they are in the mosque of hate filled with demonic beings. I suggest they put on their track shoes. But until then, earth must deal with these creatures, for massive causalities will be expected from Islam.

------------





United Nations Part 4; [Mini-Babylon]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Sept. 16, 2004

This will be my 4th article [or now you can call it: part IV, I suppose] related to the United Nations. Right when I think I had said all I wanted to say on the subject, I find, I out guessed myself, there is plenty more. Well, I will try to put it to rest after this article, but I got a few emails that reinforced the fact, the fact I needed to write this one, for it is I or someone else needs to bring to the surface the corruption of the United Nations. Someone asked what my qualifications were. You know, that is really funny, what I would ask is: "That is some pretty heavy information you are providing, is it fiction or true," and I wouldn't wait for an answer, if it really mattered, I'd go check it out. But you get the goofballs with the concerned. The goofballs are not concerned about, if my information is right on, rather if I have a right to publish it. Listen up Goofballs; if what I write to you is new, and astonishing, and unbelievable, go check it out. I did my homework, now you go do yours. And what would make me qualified? Twenty degrees in political science [or my three degrees]? How about working at the United Nations [I was there once], or how about having a friend there [I have one], or how about reading newspapers, books magazines? How about all of the above? People get mad at the messenger: get mad at the message and do something about it, or stay a goofball all your life. I do not really spend much time with these firecrackers, they got really nothing to say but gobbolegook, but it is interesting to see how many are misinformed, and get mad that I write what is actually happening.

The world is off balance, and the United Nations is the one trying to keep it that way. The neoconservatives [liken to Kerry, Carter, Clinton, excreta.), has joined the UN who has tried to explain among themselves the need for the United States not to dominate the world, preferring our US Military to be under their wings, so the UN can dominate. Should this happen, as Clinton would like, and Kerry, we will be puppets on a string for them. And another thing I want to say before I get into the bulk of this article, Vienna is right by not wanting Turkey into the EU. I've been to Asia Minor [and to the UN, where they read papers all day, and send email back and forth to their friends], and the Turkish people are fine people, but this is the 21st Century, and Islam would live to baptize Europe into their mosque, the hard way. I personally hope they do, like Bush, but that is out of revenge, and so I should retract that statement.

Emily Dickinson, a great poet once wrote:

"Surgeons must be very careful
When they take the knife!
Underneath their fine incisions
Stirs the culprit,--life!"

Underneath the UN banner, is nothing but stirred up culprits.

1) Iraq has lost about 30,000-sodiers, and about 8,000 civilians, in the most recent war with America, I know, we don't hear about that so much [only our 1000-lives taken by the Iraqis], not sure why, it only says we are cleaning house.

2) Code Falcon, is a project by which the US will be able to send non-nuclear missiles to any country in the world by 2010 AD, this is kind of a secret I suppose, in that, the media has not hyped it up, yet it is available information if you know where to look. In any case, I think this is great, not negative, where the neoconsertives publishes it as.

3) The Bush policy will allow Christian groups (for were we not founded on Christianity - yes) to compete equally with secular groups, the UN does not like this; as if we belong to the EU, or should allow the UN to make our policy.

4) Did you know India pays less than 1-million dollars to the UN, and has more personnel than most other countries on the payroll? Why not, the US puts in 7-billion, get on the payroll boys. Thus, who is paying Annan's salary, you and me?

There is an average of three persons for every job at the United Nations, and the United States is pacifying this, and to blame for allowing this corruption to go on. That is, when you pay 22% of the bill, you should have 22% of the say, not 1%. And for some odd reason we keep turning our heads the other way, and pay, pay, and pay.

Suggestion: the way to bring about reform is to insure no employee is allowed to work for more than 10-years in any UN position, or agency, and to tie the number of staff from any country to its contributions to the UN system. I bet the UN- millionaires club would not like that to happen, did you know they have one. Oh yes, big time, guess who is the head man? Mr. Annan.

Prior to 9/11, a few months prior, I was at the UN, and it is true, they all read newspapers, more than work, and email half the day long, and write books. The big question I think for the USA is this in a nut shell: Is there a return for the United States on its investment? A question that every company asks, we should ask, to me there is not. We are paying people to join the UN-Millionaires club. We are allowing China, Russia and France to sky on us in New York. Did you know that the UN Joint Staff Pension Fund (UNJSPE) has over 25-billion dollars in it, not Francs, or Euros, but dollars! And our SSAN-fund is dwindling [take our 7-billion and put it into the Social Security Fund]. A gift from the American tax payers: to the goofballs out there, go check it out; I will even give you its website: www.unjspf.org ; you can't ask more than that now can you.

*

The UN-60-years ago was founded, or in l945, next year it will be sixty years old. I was born in l947, so it is two years older than I. Should I ever do a movie or book on this subject, "The United Nations," [Mini Babylon], it would be a "Fahrenheit 911," like Mike Moron's books, I mean, Moore. He is becoming a movie star I see, with the three stooges: Penn, Robinson, and Eastwood, Eastwood has joined the clan; Sharon S. belongs in it too, but she's a lady, and like the Spice Girls, and Whoopi Goldberg, seem to be followers more than leaders.

Again I have to say, I must blame the US for its contributions to the UN's confusion by giving it so much money [I would even be tempted], they don't know what to do with it all so they all live the life of kings. This fraud is the biggest scandal in US history; and deserves a Tony Award.

A) If an employee at the UN spends 10-years in an organization, and is professional, s/he will produce a million dollar bank account, most likely, have a free housing allotment, and a free gas card.

B) Mr. Kofi Annan, now 66-years old, been at the UN since l962, is the most corrupt of the lot. But lets not forget Dr. Shashi Tharoor, from India (under-security general) I like them big titles, the bigger the title, the more justification for the $$$$'s. He is 48-years old, earns $180,000 a year; and he gets a free house and gas, and he sits at his desk and writes books. Who is paying him: it isn't coming from India's treasury, they put their money into the nuclear program, so it is you, the Americans. Give him a giggle, on me, tell him I said to get off his dead behind and do some work:
www.shashitnaroor.com.

I don't like "if's" or "buts", but I'll produce one, in this closing statement: if I was president of the US, and I would not want to be, the first thing that I would go do - besides get rid of the goofballs - is close the UN down. I would dismantle it tomorrow, and let Washington debate whatever they seem to debate at the UN at the Nations Capitol. Then I'd turn the UN building into condos, and sell them; then I'd pay back Americans for all the loose change they had to pay these third world money hogs.

------------



United Nations Part 10; The Devil's Parlor


By Dennis L. Siluk
Sept. 23, 2004

Well, somehow I think this article is going to be less substance and more attitude; I listened to John Kerry on the David Letterman Show [9/20/04], and if he didn't sound like a fairy, I'm not sure what [and so I've heard rumor to that affect anyhow]. He looked like Bucky-the-beaver. One difference between him and Goerge W. Bush is he can lie better. This guy has just not anything, I mean nothing that brings out any will in me to vote his way.

And I listened to Bush at the General Assemble at the United Nations speak [9/21/04]; and I was disappointed. The reason being, he gave too much credit to the UN and NATO for helping in Iraq. What are they doing? The UN has 20% of what they should have there for the coming elections, and complain they can't hold elections in January; thus, they create the problem, and then complain to the US, throw it at the US, as they had intended to in the first place saying they created the problems; and NATO, our 40-billion financial burden is prepping-up for doing some minimal training in and for Iraq, which France and its allies are rejecting [Germany and Spain]. Let's get it straight Mr. Bush, how can I support you when you're giving credit where credit is not due. I was actually stunned to hear you credit these tax eating monsters. Take the funds out of Europe and the manpower; send it to Iraq, problem solved for NATO and the UN, and the elections.

And Kofi Annan, he spoke of course at the UN today, and all day long. He said the PLO is killing Israelites, and Israelites are destroying Palestine homes. He got that one right, I was shocked. I thought after I heard that, maybe there is hope for this guy. He said then, "All have a duty to restore...respect...No one above the law." That means you also Mr. Annan; he neglected that, and left out the prestigious United Nations, as if it was steady and within its own law, far from the truth; liar, liar, and so forth. He is worse than Kerry and Bush.

I also listened to a woman who wrote a book on the United Nations, she was on the radio today, I think it was FM 93, can't remember for sure, but she was taking phone calls, and I told myself - after listening for about half an hour - she's not doing very well answering the questions concerning the United Nations, other than saying it is a big organization and as one, one has to look at than when evaluating its missions, etc., so for and so on. Then I said to myself, I'd not go on the radio, or had never thought about it, simply because I'm sure I'd not be all that good with the answers, but listening to her, I'd have done great, and she got a book out; all she really was, was an apologist for the UN's incompetence. Oh well; not sure why we got to apologize for NATO, or the UN, or for anyone. If you screw up, just say so, if not good.

Bush wants to put more money into a new committee at the UN, for assisting democracies, and called on the world nations to assist. Again, he disappointed me. First you got to clean house, for god-sake, how much money do we got to give these unmotivated chumps - we already give them 7-billion for running to the whore houses over in Budapest. Yet I still feel Bush is the right man for office, but he got to be Bush, not a fairy, I mean, not like Kerry.

Incidentally, I think it's been going on since l994, this North Korea thing on nuclear weapons. It has been almost [98.5%] proven, North Korea has eight [8] nukes. Instead of begging these jerks to stop, and having them blackmail us, just give Japan and Taiwan all the nukes they can handle, and watch China get involved: you see when the equation changes, so does the attitude. China doesn't mind North Korea having them, because they are on China's side. And Russia does not mind Iran having them, Iran is on Russia's side; so lets change the equation.

------------







United Nations Part 11; [Goofballs Galore - General Assembly]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Sept. 24, 2004

[The Woman] Got an email from a woman today, Marge [another Jane Fonda] somehow I can't preannounce her last name yet. She was mad because I sounded on the United Nations, and she implied I didn't talk enough on my doings in Vietnam that I must had been drunk all the time (she should had read some of my other articles had she really been interested). I emailed her back, wasn't sure what me being in Vietnam had to do with it [she sure weasn't there, all she did was read about it with whomever], but she got the drunk part right, I sure was, like Kerry [maybe not as much, maybe more] - but I wasn't high like he was on dope everyday; and I didn't get a Purple Heart for any scratches I may have gotten - I guess it is ok to sound on anyone she doesn't like but the ones she does like, its forbidden; I just didn't put on any bandages like John Kerry in Vietnam and parade around: look at me, look how hurt I am; his own team from Vietnam, about eight of them will not support him for president, that is saying something. She's mad because she happens to be in the Goofball catagory. It's ok honey, just got to live with it.

I think she's having a hard time believing the United Nations would be subject to any wrong doings, like Kerry. Not sure where she's from, Never-Never Land I think. For some odd reason she thinks I have to conform to her literately standards; let me remained her in the USA we have what is called the First Amendment - for now, with Kerry we may lose that also. And she didn't like that I used the word "African," I suggested she go buy a dictionary, and look at the subject matter. And last but not least, she thinks I lust after money or hate women or both. Not sure in what order. I like money and I like women. I'm not gay if that is what she was inferring to. And I don't hate women because they have money, all the more power to them. And I don't hate Kofi Annan because he is African - it's a fact; I don't hate him anymore than he hates me being an American; for that is what I am. But before I get into this new area of the United Nations, I just wanted to share Marge's provocative email: for her life is centered evidently on her illusions, not reality. Annan cuts the US down almost daily; David Letterman and Jay Leno cut the President down almost daily, she should be protesting them, but she protests me - because I cut down the opposite. Good show, like I've always said, there are enough goofballs out there to fill the Mississippi. It's a two way highway your on Marge, not a oneway.

Iran Testing the Water:

There has been some word-plucking from the Iranian media, concerning the diplomats; particularly the ones negotiating with the IAEA; they feel we American's [not anyone else, like the EU or UN], will not be happy until we deprive Iran of Nuclear Weapons; I thought this was a world goal. They know the issue will not be resolved in November, and they know we are considering striking them, or Israel, I'd had hit them log ago. By the time the UN and EU get going, we will not have to talk anymore they will have the weapons. And around the corner Syria is picking up on this, and of course, North Korea has had them since 1994, and now Brazil, all because the UN and EU are farting around. We might just as well let them have them, since the UN and EU don't care; and load Japan and Taiwan up with as many nukes as possible, they will need them. You see Russia wants Iran to have them, as China wants North Korea to have them, they just don't want anyone else to have them, pro-American.

Oh we are fighting a war way beyond the grips of the cold war.

Iran Testing the Nukes:

Iran feels the passage of the most recent bill, and/or any bills are illegal and barbarous concerning their right to have nuclear weapons, and that the IAEA is against Iranian nuclear technology, Mr. Musavian, the orator of the Iranian delegation, said: "From the beginning of the crisis, we have insisted that Iran's right to exploit nuclear technology in peaceful ways must [be] recognized, and today the three European countries have obviously and officially recognized all Iran's rights according to clause four of the statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency"! What is he talking about: rights, rights to use nuclear weapons [he implies to only have them]? So what concession has been made by the Europeans? They underestimate the Iran is the essence of it. But Iran is trying to convey to their people Europe will go along with their show, as will the United Nations, it is the bad guys, the US they need to fight.

"[From Iran] ...regarding yesterday's resolution of the board of governors, if Iran softens its position on its legitimate rights and agrees to admit and implement the resolution, America and its allies will not need to refer the dossier to the UN Security Council because what they seek to achieve by doing so will be achieved by Iran's acceptance of the resolution.

Don't they intend to deprive the Islamic Republic of Iran of nuclear technology?"

Apparently our respected leaders have forgotten that America and her allies have frequently said that their final goal is to completely deprive Iran of nuclear activities, and during the last two years they have violated all international rules, the NPT, and statute of the IAEA, and safeguard agreements in order to achieve their objectives. Therefore, are we not simple-minded..."

- I see U.S. Ambassador John Danforth greeted Secretary-General Kofi Annan with a congenial "Kofi!" at the start of the day; are we playing games here, with our diplomatic obsequiousness of "Mr. Secretary-General."

- I see Annan ringing the Japanese Peace Bell, too bad he doesn't adhere to it, while watching all the people die in Sudan. The US is the only one I hear condemning them.

- Haiti where I have been [some years ago] pleaded for help with their most recent storm; in addition, speakers expressed their compassion and outrage over the attack of a school in Russia this month that led to the killing of more than over three hundred people.

Annan summed up the guts of the General Assembly, during a lunch with world leaders that almost sat on top of one another, around tables, at the Delegates Lounge. He toasted to world peace and said in essence, the "rifts" remaining over the Iraq war will heal. Yet he will not lift a finger to assist; a two-faced African; who loves money and women; not that I blame him.






United Nations Part 12; [Dr. Wolfgang Hoffmman: CTBTO]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Sept. 25, 2004

His wish is coming true, he is a learned man, a man of importance, a rich man, a man of pleasure, and a man that will do anything to stay in that position. For those who do not know him he is: Executive Secretary of the CTBTO Preparatory Commission, Dr. Wolfgang Hoffmman. A big title, and as I have mentioned before, the bigger, the richer; being rich is better than being poor, I'm sure he'd agree with that. But who is he:

He was a refugee from Eastern Europe (Sudaten German) and endured a childhood of hunger, poverty and social exclusion but he vowed to get out of it and become rich; and good for him, he achieved his goal. But with every treasure and effort, sometimes we got to step on people, its part of the compensation for being poor at one time. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

Now he compensates by overeating (pork) and drinking beer - I used to like beer, but it got me in trouble, like it is getting him in trouble. I'm sure he says something like this: we are mortal and time is like a puff of wind, suddenly we are gone, dead, so do it now. An old philosophy from the days of Gilgamish, King of Uruk; he actually, kind of actually, reminds me of Gilgamish. I shall explain. He personifies the seven deadly sins [like Gilgamesh, read the epic if you wish to know more of him] and has a voracious appetite for food, sex, money and power; not sure in what order. He hates people who come from a middle class or rich background. Dr. Hoffmann has visited more countries than the Pope and has had sex with more persons than Ron Jeremy. It is no secret to his staff, or amongst the UN as a whole his activities. Furthermore, He grants promotions to both men and women in return for sex. He is a great admirer of Adolph Hitler and Daniela Rozgonova is his mistress. He spares no opportunity to ridicule President George W. Bush and his Administration. He is a man who totally lacks human compassion and emotional intelligence.

He thinks he has a good sense of humor but as Mark Twain once said: "A German joke is no laughing matter." Physically he looks like he was designed by a horde of elves; this short fat, pink faced man who walks around in a bowtie. He is a racist of the first order and is one of the most insecure persons in the United Nations. Unless Dr. Hoffmann is not removed by the U.S. very soon he will continue his anti-American activities.

Wolfgang Hoffmann, born 27 October 1935, married, two children, German national, University and State law degrees and a Doctorate in International Law; Mr. Hoffmann entered the German Foreign Service in 1965.

Postings to the: Permanent Mission in Geneva from 1965 - 1966; Consulate General in New York from 1967 - 1970; Embassy in Ankara from 1973 - 1977; Permanent Mission in Vienna from 1981 - 1985; Embassy in London from 1985 - 1988; Permanent Representative of the Federal Republic of Germany to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva from 1993 - 1997.

At the Foreign Office in Bonn Dr. Hoffmann served as: Desk Officer for the Indian subcontinent from 1970 - 1973 Deputy Head of the Science Division from 1977 - 1981; Head of the Environment Division from 1988 - 1993; since March 1997 Mr. Hoffmann serves as the Executive; Secretary of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO PrepCom) in Vienna. www.ctbto.org

How we got all these overpaid anti-American in the United Nations, and being paid with American dollars is beyond me. But I hope Bush is restored to office, and let's start with getting Kofi Annan out off or payroll and then Hoffmann, and then his girlfriend. It is like paying someone to sit down and slap you in the face, then pay him for doing a good job at it.

------------





United Nations Part 17; Special Report [Timothy E. Writh]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 5, 2004

Timothy E. Wirth, president, UN Foundation can't figure it out why the United Nations is getting so much bad public attention. If he can not figure that out he needs to be replaced also. He needs to review articles and address them; we need a foundation the world can trust, not one filled with spies trying to drain the United States, bad mouth them at ever corner, take the tax money out of the mouths of Americas. It is like a bad wife, or useless one, you're better with none, than with one that works against you. Timothy is simply trying to keep his job, so I don't blame him for shooting his mouth off, I'd do the same if I was starving, but I don't get paid for this article, so you can see where I'm coming from, its not a job, it's a duty; or call it a contribution.

Take out the US and Japan and they'd go broke, that is 42% of their wages, and we get very little in return. Not a very good investment. I think we can do better.

Dr. John R. Bolton feels the same way from what hear and read. He questions the UN's IAEA, the International Atomic Energy Agency. Is this Timothy - one of those mishaps where "we are all wrong, and you're right," things? Must be, because I'm not alone on this; anyhow, what I was about to say, was Marion Baillot, says they are "...inefficient against nuclear proliferation..." exactly what we are paying the group to do. Now if I was inefficient, I'd not have a bank account, and whomever I worked for - after a while, if they kept me on the payroll, would go bankrupt, exactly what I am saying about the United Nations, you are bankrupt, the only thing carrying you from day to day is the American and Japanese tax payers. The rest of the world pay so little they don't count; that includes China who pays little and gets much, and Russia with all its oil, can't figure out how these two clowns get away with paying next to nothing.

Why doesn't the UN put suicide bombings, under the/or into the "crimes against humanity," because they are mostly centered toward Jews, that is another dilemma I find with the UN. If it wasn't for the US, the United Nations and its silly court system, would have them all hung from trees. As would the EU; and don't look so surprised, they all know it, except us Americans, we seem to be in the fog.

The Cuban spokesman said President Roosevelt handcuffed the UN and so does President Bush. He would have us let Saddam go and his Henchman so they could kill at will the citizens of Iraq, but then, the spokesman was being paid by whom other than a dictator like Saddam, Castro. So we let the slime talk at the UN, against us, and we listen, but be that as it may, they don't pay a dime, yet the UN let's them go play pool, use the computers, and the long distance phone calls, it's on the tax payers of Japan and America - not on Annan's country in Africa that gets a lot and pays if anything, a child could count it. So yes, a few things get me upset about the United Nations, as it should you.

------------





United Nations Part 23; [New World Order]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 11, 2004

1
New World Order

Most of us have heard - now, for awhile of this New World Order - that it was/or is in the making, was/ and now is coming; we all heard of it for a while now - or should have, this so called New World Order [I repeat myself to insure you get this message]. I started reading about it in, or around l983, along with some of the first books I read about Globalism. This whole concept was a new world for me back then; it has been in the making though for over two-hundred years, for a long time. But Reagan and the Pope [John Paul II] interrupted its finalization. But I'm getting ahead of myself again; so the date has/was moved up to around 2010+ for it to be fully developed. France is one of the main pushers of this new order, and it actually did originate in England long before I was born, and the elite of Oxford, had their worksheets working on this concept. What we see in this developing New World Order, which the Pope has/or is against, really against; what we see is, in addition to the Popes agitation with this, a conspiracy to force the US into this dangerous World Government. Thus, we got the EU and the UN working together on this; along with other groups.

In Romans 12, it says in so many words [for us Christians, anyways]: do not conform to this world; there is good reason for that, we are being brought into Lucifer's/Satan's Road Map - France's Glory, and America's demise. The Counsel on Foreign Affairs is involved with this ongoing conspiracy. As Mr. Goodwater's book indicates, the Trilateral Commission is one of the agent's against America with this concept. In the book of Revelation, Chapter 17, we see the EU/revised Roman Empire taking hold of the world by force or dialogue: which ever works. The Club of Rome was for this world order also.

So these are dangerous times, and many forces are working against us, as Americans and Christians. But as it says in the bible: let not your heart be troubled, the Lord will be coming with thousands of his saints.

President Bush has resisted this movement also, but Kerry has not. When it comes about, we will be simply part of a worldwide computer chip.

2
Anti-Semitic

Someone had mentioned to me yesterday the name Professor Norman G. Finkelstein. Born 1953, went to the University that F. Scott Fitzgerald went to, whom lived but four blocks from my apartment building I used to own; both went to an Ivey League college. Scott's books, of which I read most, and have most first editions, have more mistakes in them than my books have; and gee I only went to the University of Minnesota, the University of Maryland, the Troy State University (part of the University of Alabama system); a theological seminary [6-months], and est., so when I hear that, I'm almost impressed, but then when I check out his essays I'm not all that impressed, I think: where did all the brain power go; I mean logic and common sense, which is not all that common nowadays. But I thank this old dinosaur for this knowledgeable information on this guy called Norman, although I do not agree with much of his circular discussions, the dinosaur, but he makes more sense than Norman, and is less anti-Semitic (I think). I guess I look at what people say, and then what they do. And most say it is not true, and go do the very thing they are accused of.

But I'm getting a little off track, what I wanted to bring to surface was of course the United Nations anti-Semitic character. Now I do realize most of us know there is an ardent desire in the UN, with/by most nations to cripple Israel, if they could (they would). It is not new, and even Kofi Annan is well known for his hate in this area. So let's not pretend there is not a snake running loose in the halls of the UN after little Israel, Mr. UN. That is why Israel has to be careful, least they are eaten alive by the UN snakes.

But anyhow, why is it that over half of the UN's emergency meetings end up condemning Israel? I mean that is a big amount. Also, why is it that Israel is the only, I mean only, only, only - nation in the world, disqualified from joining the Security Counsel Membership? Yes, yes, the snakes have infested the halls with Semitic poisons. I realize I will not change a thing on this earth, but at least it should be down right clear.

From what I've read, and I have not read all that much, Norman is not for the Jew, and as far as I can see he is an outcast Jew. But that is his right, or racket; however it comes to be. He feels Israel has a Gestapo type security system. If I was living in Israel, next to the PLO, I'd have more then a Gestapo type system in place, I'd had built that wall mighty quick; I'd had built it twenty-five years ago. Matter of fact, I'd not had let the PLO move in, in the first place, after they got kicked out of Jordan, and Egypt, Syria and Lebanon. I mean, when your own kind do not want you around, you need a Gestapo type system in place, if you want to see the sun rise tomorrow anyways. This guy Norman also believes in armed resistance, but on the other hand I read a statement, he'd prefer dialogue, but then don't they all say that. I'm sure the PLO is happy to have a Jew who has published four books - it sounds like - against Zionism. It makes their day.

You would think, since the Middle East has 600-times the geographical land mass as Israel, that someone would give the PLO a little land as to build their nation on. But of course, that is not the purpose is it.



United Nations Part 24; [Zionism/Lucifer/Vienna's UN]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 11, 2004

1
Lucifer (the angel with the light)/Zionism

It is hard to figure where to start with all this UN-stuff, but wherever I start you can rest assure, the carrier of light, the angel of light has been there and the God of the air. If you look in the bible you will see he is none other than Lucifer, now called Satan.

I was corrected by Henk [Destree]; he said Zionism (said to me) is not the Jewish Movement, as I implied in my article, referring to the Lobby in Washington. Fetishism, I could use, I suppose. So lets, or let me look at this, how I could have screwed this all up so bad. I think what he is trying to tell me is that you can be a Jew, live in Israel and not be in the "movement," or "advancing of the Jewish National State of Israel." I can figure this out because one of the carriers of light against Zionism is none other then Professor Norman G. Finkelstein. But the truth of the matter is they normally go hand in hand. But for confusion sake - as Finkelstein would surely agree with, Henk (I think) since Norman has been kicked out of the good graces of the Jewish state, and Zionism, and Israel, we can separate them, but they are simply layers; so Charles, I'm sorry if I confused the swordsmen who would wish to cut off the heads of Zionist and not the heads of Jews.

2
Vienna's UN

The CTBTO-PTS Executive Secretary Dr. Wolfgang Hoffmann hosted a breakfast meeting on 8th October at the Vienna International Center for a group of Ambassadors mainly Europeans who support his stay in this post as long as he desires. Something tells me he is rounding up all the folks he can muster to keep his job.

At a meeting held yesterday the European Union (EU/Satan's carrier of light) under the current Presidency of the Netherlands proposed the postponement of the vote to elect his successor till June 2005 so that the heads of the other Vienna-based international organizations, the IAEA and UNIDO can also be held and states and regional groups can nominate common candidates. This move has been opposed by the developing states as it is a clear ploy by Dr. Hoffmann to extend his stay and continue to abuse his position. The original vote was to be held on Friday, 8th October 2004. But you can't blame him can you, get all you can while you can. And he has put so much work into his deception, I mean, why not reap the rewards as long as he can, so I think he feels. But even he will only be used long enough by the Angel of Light, to satisfy his needs.

Dr. Hoffmann is planning another luxury trip (he loves to travel ((getting some sun, sand and sex)) this time to eight states: South Asia included, Bhutan, India and Pakistan which have not signed the CTBT and to Nepal and Sri Lanka which have not ratified it. Afghanistan, Bangladesh and the Maldives have ratified it of course. Hoffmann will also be at the UNGA in New York in late October to address the First Committee of the General Assembly (him and Annan and the Angel of Light, can figure out where next to go). How many more of his holidays will the U.S taxpayers, and Japanese fund (which is 42.5 % of the total UN budget) have to support such play? Daniela Rozgonova is likely to accompany him on his travel; she just can't keep her hands off this guy, what is it. He must be a swinger, or good company.

It is well know within the walls of the Vienna UN that the incompetence and abuse of power by Dr. Hoffmann and the Chief of the Public Information Section, Daniela Rozgonova is an on going saga with our tax monies. How long will this be allowed is a good question? And to be quite honest, I wonder about the personality of Daniela Rozgonova, it would seem to me it is a disorder (reminds me of a gal I had the pleasure of writing a while ago to, and they both seem a little like each other ((Alyce Ornella)). Anyhow, in my professional opinion, and I'm retired from counseling, thank god, I'd call it paranoid - Daniela Rozgonova; I can't prove that, but I sense it, I have like a scent, and it leads me to that, and by empirical data.

Paranoid personality disorder is characterized by a distrust of others and a constant suspicion that people around you have sinister motives (maybe I might be her sinister motive, but I'm not around her so I've got to eliminate me). People with this disorder tend to have excessive trust in their own knowledge and abilities and usually avoid close relationships with others (in this case she has let of course the horny Hoffmann in (and again Alyce comes to mind, not in the horny part, just the sinister motive part). They search for hidden meanings in everything and read hostile intentions into the actions of others (here comes Henk). They are quick to challenge the loyalties of friends and loved ones and often appear cold and distant to others. They usually shift blame to others and tend to carry long grudges. There is, something called illusions of people while in this state, involutional paranoid and other states of course. As there is in psychoses also a paranoid type (chemical use, and surely abuse should not be tolerated if there is a disorder present of this magnitude); but enough of that, it is of course conjecture. And like all of the above, I've got my opinion.

Nonetheless, I'm sure Daniela Rozgonova is still collecting her US$10,000 of tax free money, for "work" of some 40-hours a month, and I hear she likes them coffee shops during office hours. I like them myself, Barnes and Noble in Roseville, at Har Mar Mall has a good one, Gary is the store manager, look him up, tell him I sent you, I'm sure he'll give you a good cup of coffee, and Jerry is the manager of the coffee shop. Ann Rule was there the other day, nice lady. We got talking about disorders than I had to skip and watch the Presidents debate. She left a book there for me a nice inscription, than I ended up giving one of my books away. Not good for business. Anyhow, let me add, the fact that she continues in her post after four years of doing this same routine, means that the PTS management has no sense, or a bad sense of humor; or third, is getting rewarded on the side.

The recent PTS picnic, a lunch for the most part where Dr. Hoffmann and Daniela themselves with a group of 150-staff members and their young children, waited in line in the hot sun for over an hour, as an Ambassador said and I heard, kind of heard, "...his country and regional group want the 'German Swine Hoffmann replaced ASAP."

------------




United Nations Part 25; [Fragments And Lashes]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 13, 2004

1
United Kingdom

The United Kingdom lashes out at the EU, while the UN looks the other way trying to figure out how to win the US election for Kerry [focus, focus]. It would seem the UK is not happy lately with their partner the EU; I cannot blame them.

2
Italy

Italy blocks Germany's bid for a UN-permanent membership on the Security Counsel; to me that would be like putting the Chief United Nations Officer-Annan as the Vice President of the United States, god help us all then. Good for Italy though. We all ready have two Europeans on the Security Counsel [France and England], do we really need more [?] I would say let Rome on before Berlin; President Berlusconi of Italy has been more of a friend than the Germans, whom we supported for fifty- years (get them off our welfare roll). The Romans know better than to trust the Germans, we should learn by them. Schroeder, the German Gestapo would love to put his heel under Rome, and then France and Germany can have a hay-day at the UN trying to put their heel under the US.

I suggest we give Asia another look, such as Japan, why not, they pay 20% of the total UN bill and get 1% of its rewards (if that). Russia and China pay 35-million together (but can buy rockets and nukes up the dupa - and in the billions of dollars), a drop in the bucket compared to Japan's contribution of 6.5-billion dollars a year, not yen; and get all the glory they want from the UN Chief, Annan, and France: that is loose change for Japan's donations. Plus, it would give a better balance for Asia; but China would most likely pick North Korea for the seat, and Russia would pick Iran for the Security Counsel seat. Iran has already tired to become Mr. Annan's opponent; better put, he'd like his job and has requested so.

3
Fox/Reeves

Michael J. Fox, as we all know has turned from TV, to activist, with all respect intended, are we know using Fox's Parkinson's disease to get votes for Kerry. I have Multiple Sclerosis, should I use that to get votes for Bush. Come on now let's leave the voting for logic, not sympathy. I even see Kerry running to Reeves funeral, and give a lecture on Superman's behalf, hoping for possibilities. I thought I saw it all in campaigns, until now. Mr. Kerry paid tribute to the death of Mr. Reeves and told the public how inspired he was. I was not inspired by Mr. Kerry's uncouthness, but Mr. Reeves did contribute to those who bore his sickness, likewise.

4
Australia

I think the Financial Times [FT] is getting more biased by the week, like Dan Rather; but I suppose it is their right, since it is their newspaper. I will have to turn to the New York Times, which I used to read. John Howard won his 4th term as Australia's President in spite of backing Bush up in Iraq. Smart guy and a man with grit and integrity, more than I can say about Singapore, and South Korea, which are getting soft; the United Nations don't like this of course, nor does Kerry, but you know it is what the people want, and when you have an ally that is what that country should be.

Why on God's earth do we even have even one soldier in Old Europe is beyond me, they despise us, pull them out tomorrow Mr. Bush. And now South Korea is crying help, as I predicted they would, for us to leave our troops there in fear of the Panda Bear (China) and the Axis of Evil empire swarming down to eat them up, which they would do. I would tell them tomorrow: send an equal amount of troops to Iraq or guard your own country yourself; butch of belly aching cowards.







United Nations Part 26; [World War IV/Israel and Iran]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 14, 2004

1
WWIV

It doesn't seem to click with a lot of people, not sure if we are in a fog, underwater, under a spell or just dumb. The issue, the real issue, the one under the surface, the one not always looked at, the one floating, racing around the globe is not Saddam per se, nor is it Iraq, or Iran and its nuclear quest like North Korea per se; nor is it Al Queda specifically, or Syria and Saudi Arabia who sponsor and support terrorist acts and groups in the name of Allah, harbor them in their backyard, breeding them like a litter of jackals in search of its next victim [s]; nor is it the United Nations directly, but is indirectly; and Israel normally the scapegoat for most everyone's owes, shouldn't be - but is part of this global phenomenon and global paranoia. It is all of the above combined, collectively. It starts at the United Nations and circles the globe from New York to San Francisco, to Japan and Java, Bali, the Pacific and right on to India and the Middle East to Berlin and Paris, and stops in Washington D.C. The truth of the matter is we are in WWIV. Plain and simple, WWI was fought in the trenches; WWII fought on land, sea and in the air, and WWIII, the cold war was fought in/with skirmishes, rhetoric repeat over and over; spies, finances and in body bags. Now WWIV - is upon us, it will be fought differently in that, it will be on our doorsteps, it is just a matter of time [has already started].

And so when we talk about how Bush sent troops to Iraq, and NATO is in Afghanistan, as well as Eastern Europe, and France is in Africa trying to put out fires, and South Korea is afraid of their own shadows now, since we said we were moving out, it proves it is not Iraq alone, it is the world at large, that is at war, and all of a sudden instead of fighting it jointly, the world has stepped back and let the USA fight it alone, for their own personal reasons and most of them prideful and financial. But in so doing they have allowed themselves to become vulnerable.

All I hear is countries and the United Nations talking about the USA and how they want more money [do this, do that, while they do nothing but talk, cheap talk]; the is EU talking about the World Trade, and contracts, while we are fighting a war; the World Court trying to get America to fall under its authority while we are fighting two wars; the world oil supply goes down, down and down - while China's use goes up, up up. We are living in dangerous times, somehow I think this division has opened up doors for the enemy in all directions - and showed America who can and who we can not trust (possible God sent); and let's not shoot the blame, or point fingers at the USA, it's a cheap trick, and one used often to take the focus off them. The "if's" and "but's" belong in your own backyard.

In a like manner, he world has let Israel fight its own battle, and when it starts to win the war of terror in its back yard then the world wakes up and gets in a moody position, but does not lift a finger to stop the terrorist acts, but finds room to condemn Israel for self- preservation, as it has now done to the USA. It's always the guy with the big mouth that that puts the penny in the donation slot, and waits in line to get a free meal thinking he done humanity a great service - that is the United Nations in a nutshell, concerning Israel, and now its arrogance towards the United States. On a last note, let me say, everyone is counting how much money we are spending on war in Iraq. Every war costs; but it has to be measured on what it would cost if we do not wage war. Possible another city bombed, or what.

2
Israel

The Question is arising in Israel [and at the UN], day by day, should or should they not bomb Iran's nuclear installations? It is a simple question for me. If my neighbor had a machine gun, and he was known for using it on his neighbors he did not like, he would not have it long I assure you of that, police or no police I would find a way to take it away or bury it, with or without him. Or put it another way, my neighbor has a wild dog in her backyard - or it is becoming wild, and it can jump over the fence I think, I've watch the dog grow from a pup, and in another six months should its master tell it to jump on me, over the fence, it will be able to do so; and it will some day I'm sure do it without the masters call. Thus, should I wait or should I kill it. It would be very easy to kill now, harder later, especially if it attacks me first. I have tried endlessly to avoid any such happenings, but she says she has a right to have a mild or wild dog, but she allows the dog to run around the yard without a careful eye on it. Should I do a pre-emptive strike on this dog? Or wait until it eats my little cute wife up? Things are never so simple are they? She wants her rights without responsibility.

Tel Aviv is considering such a move, and I can't blame them, I hope we sell them the "bunker buster," bombs they need, it will forestall whatever dreams they [they being: Iran per se] have on shooting one over to the University at Tel Aviv. These precision-guided bombs are capable of doing much damage underground. And anyway you cut the pie, Israel knows as does Tehran, Iran will have nuclear weapons by 2007, and use it for a first strike. Major-General Giora Eiland, National Security Adviser is very concerned on this matter, feeling, anyone trying so hard to get the big bomb is surely going to use it, blackmail with it, or both.

In the mean time Iran has not cooperated with the United Nations IAEA, and faces sanctions, which they laugh at - for they have defied the UN out right and think nothing of it. The question might be: how close are they to nuclear capability [launch capability will be in 2007]. Well, they are at the moment right on top of it. They are there. Who will be next to want it? Let me guess, how about the wild card: Syria; and why not Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Dr. Kam has bellowed out of his lungs, is so many words: should the IAEA not be able to persuade Tehran to stop its nuclear ambitions, the US should intervene militarily. First of all, the IAEA has failed already, it is written history. Second, let Israel do the fly over if they want (it is their gain or loss); all the better, save jet fuel for American tax payers, and they are pretty good at it. And why wait - for what?

[#27: Do we need the UN to oserve our elections; a new request from world leaders to control our country]

------------





United Nations Part 27; UN-US Eagle-eyes and UN Corruption


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 15, 2004

1
Who wants want?

A number of NGOs (non-governmental organizations ((basically Kerry supporters)): Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, the Economic Human Rights Project, Alliance for Democracy and National Welfare Rights Union want the United Nations (in essence they want to beak in) to monitor, observe closely the elections of November 2, 2004 - presidential elections in the United States, in fear Bush might make it a second term. A petition has been in the making. This of course would take a mandate from the General Assembly I would think [as a request from a Government, not a group, or legislative branch], and we could I assume veto it should it go to the General Assembly. The OSCE, based in Vienna is the main regional security organization, so it would have to - I suppose again, come out of there as a package wrapped up under crisis management/intervention. In addition, the Europeans would like to observe at first hand the elections also.

Recommendations:

Europeans are not welcome in my eyes to observe anything in the USA except tourist attractions; that is, in election capacity for sure; they are not American citizens, and it is even rude of them to ponder the thought. As the France said to the US not long ago, "Stay out of our politics." The only thing they want is to influence the decision making.

The United Nations would do well to monitor their selves before they try to monitor us also; from what I see, they got a long and hefty road ahead of them trying to do just that; how on earth can one expect them to monitor us when they are so scornful and corrupt themselves. If they want to monitor so bad, get on over to Iraq, they are begging for them there. How come they did not want to monitor the Russian Elections? It is the old saying: clean up your own house before you try to clean up ours. I don't trust the UN's motives anymore than I do the Europeans: neither are they trust worthy - least they think I'm gullible.

And these cheesy - NGO-groups wanting US citizens to be subject to this is an act if not violation of our privacy. Go save the whales.

2
UN Corruption

Corruption in the United Nations, you got to be kidding. A woman wrote me about a month ago, just couldn't believe the UN was a pot of crickets, as they say in Peru: she even went as far as trying to make me feel as if it was a sacred temple, and I'd be hell bound for my truths. My dear lady (I think she has seen the Angel of Light, the one God kicked out of heaven, Lucifer the deceiver), the UN is a snakeskin; meaning, snakes shed their skins, as do other animals. In this case, we have to see where it came from - the snakeskin. It was the first skin: that being, the League of Nations, when they became so corrupt and squabbling, useless, and could do no good for world order or peace, it was abandon for - you got it, the UN, thus, it shed its skin. It's a simple matter of reviewing history. Well, now is the time to shed its skin again, and come up with a new order for peace. As the old saying goes, if it doesn't work and you can't fix it, throw it away. It is by all means, a costly old rusty rim on a new Catallac.

But let's look at this a little deeper. The "Oil for Food," generated some $67 billion dollars in profits for food. Where did all this money go? Supposedly there is a committee looking into this, but it is no surprise to many; why? because it is not only clear to the Iraqi government, but to the US Government as well where it all went. Let me explain. In January, 2004, the Iraqi Newspaper al-Mada came out with a list of 270- names, people-names, who were involved with the corruption (some 11-billion and possible much more), to include governments, activists, journalists and UN staff. A report came out saying a top UN official took bribes from Iraq to subvert the program. UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said recently, he was funding a $30-million dollar investigation into this matter, funding it out of Iraqi funds - nonetheless. How will he save his soul, I don't know.

Anyhow, now it should be plain to see why France and Russia opposed the war in Iraq so strongly: they never wanted peace, why: payoffs in the billions. Thus, Saddam was their golden boy. Why else would they fight so hard against the US: money, money, money and more money; they were in stone-shock when we went against their golden wishes. They could careless if the women got raped or freedom to vote went down the drain, that is why they opposed us so cold heartedly now and then; nor do they care/or did they care about the children if they ate - they, like Saddam, took the food out of their mouths and bought their French wine with it (if anybody should carry the shame box, it is them); nor did they care who sat in the prison cells (except when the US took possession of them), or in the trench-graves, that they found back then and recently. The French are friends to no one unless there is a gift waiting. It was, and is money, money and more money all the time for them and the over stocked corrupt UN. The French are a profit for hire country, meaning: do as you please as long as you pay, and we'll look the other way.

------------






United Nations Part 28; [Abortions/Gestaposim/Syria-Annan]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 16, 2004

1
UN-Abortions

The Bush Administration has not jumped at the chance to follow the many at the United Nations again, and they just can't figure it out. Really, 250-world figures jumped at the chance to promote Family Planning, but no one is saying, under the surface is hidden Abortion, no, they are just saying: Bush will not go along with the world agenda. Ted Turner the tycoon who funds the UN Foundation helped organize the dispatch.

Let's look at a few of these world leaders: Jimmy Carter, he's an old Baptist boy like me, and should be ashamed of himself for backing such a request. And Bill Clinton, he'll go along with anything for a joke. And 47-Nobel Prize winners, you can tell the value of the prize by the smell of the death that sticks to it. The Nobel Committee has lost its credibility long ago; it's an activist organization now, and not worth its salt; I'd rather get a Bronze Star.

The good thing about this is President Bush has held $34-million of its funds for the UN Population Fund (UNFPA); let Ted flip the bill if he likes it so much.

Also, Washington does not have to prove anything [as they think it should], if they want the money, they have to prove it is not for abortion, which they now proclaim it is not so they can get the money; yet in practicability, it is. If this is not so, where are they getting the funds to perform them abortions with? I personally do not want one dime of my tax money to go to the UN-Baby-Killer-Fund.

2
UN-German Gestapo's

Everyone seems to want to be part of the Permanent Security Council at the UN nowadays. Japan wants the prize, and China and South Korea oppose it; Argentina and Mexico want to stop Brazil from gaining a head seat on the committee; Poland and Italy want to block the Germans,-- while France and Britain support the Gestapo's. It a madhouse with all these UN aspirations, but what I find really, I mean really funny is: I want to say paradoxical, but really should say hypocritical, is this: Germany supported the war in Kosovo without a UN mandate, and it opposed the Iraq war, because the US and UK could not secure a Security Council endorsement. Schroder was of course the one behind this. Plus he was against toppling Saddam, even if the UN approved it. I think Germany was better off with Helmut Schmidt. In any case, Germany is going back to the days of Gestapoism.

3
Syria, can you hear!

The UN has been bellowing out its request that Syria pull out its 14,000-troops of Lebanon for a long time now and even got a resolution to that effect. What is the good of a resolution when they laugh at them, and threaten the UN, and the UN sinks to accepting payoffs? Even Kofi Annan's son is on the hit list for payoffs.

The UN says they will keep the heat on Syria, and want the secretary general to report back to the Security Council in three months. So what does Lebanon do for the next three months? The UN is a paper-tiger.

In addition, Syria, France and Russia are all three a sad case, to say the least. During the months before the war with Iraq, Syrian Foreign Minister Farouk Al-Shara, told the world, and the Security Counsel, war with Iraq was not the solution (as did France and Russia), that peace can be achieved without armed military. Now during all this chitchat, guess what, Syria was rolling in the dollars - yes, while this hypocrite was telling us we should have peace, he was getting paid off by contracts, from Saddam, while Saddam was buying machine guns, 20-million worth; and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs). So when the French, Syrian or Russian want to stand tall and say peace, look behind it for $$$-signs, pocket money. And guess where the delivery points were, right in Syria, at a sum of $1.2 billion worth of forbidden weapons.

So if you think they are friends doing us favors, think again, they care less about peace or terrorism until it hits home. And that goes for Secretary General Kofi Annan, one of the biggest heels the UN has yet to breed. Simply look at Rwanda and Sudan, which has proven he cannot influence a soul. Leadership is influencing, and this guy is a disaster waiting to happen; not only to world peace, but America per se. Furthermore, he wants 778-new positions for the UN, at 97-million dollars, now who is going to pay for it, how about his country. He's also worried about Japan pulling their 6.5- billion out of their UN fund that would mean the Millionaires Club might not survive. I wrote about that before, he of course belongs to it. And the concept is: if you can stay ten-years at any given UN, at a decent position, you will be in the club, thus you will be a millionaire, no matter if you were feeding pigs in Rwanda before you got to the UN.

------------





United Nations Part 30; [The Goon-Squad In Terrorism]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 19, 2004

Let's get down to the grit-and-crap of the of the trash can of this issue. Terrorism is here to stay why - Right? Maybe not you say. Wishful thinking - maybe you're right. Well let's go back to the United Nations, we have to end up there one way or another, it starts there, and it will end there. As we all know, the Security Council voted to condemn terrorism recently. The resolution was brought forward by none-other than, Russia; still crying over its recent terrorist attack, had it not been for that, 9/11 did nothing to them to force this vote - or them coming forward. But when it's in your own backyard, well, it's a different story isn't it. And to be quite honest, it was not easy to even get the vote they got, a lot of neck twisting went on behind the scenes.

The main reason the United Nations is having trouble with getting a decent terrorist resolution, besides a simply vote in place, or even condemning it is not because of the United Nations per se, I hate to admit, or the West, but the collapse is in the Organization of the Islamic Conference [the Muslims], it has fifty-six of the UN's 191-members defending terrorism as a right, and the Qur'an and Allah backing them up. How can you fight them when you got their bible backing them up? You will never get a decent resolution out of that.

Solution [fight fire with fire; rights with rights]: People will say: this is too harsh, we are a civilized society; but remember who you are fighting, a non-civilized environment; the US/UK and Russia [leave the rest of the cowards out] should create a goon-squad, and start doing the same thing the goons do, attack. Use tax payer's money (why not, they use it for abortions), use it for killing the Islamic-goons, like Israel does. They got a hit squad, and when the unofficial-official government goes for a strike, strike them back. Matter of fact, strike them back anyhow - before they strike (they got big cities to, and places of worship). They got a lot of targets just like Madrid, and Russia and New York, and Bali. Who do you hit, how do you think these folks are supporting themselves, it's the nice countries like Saudi Arabia, and our friends in Syria, and Egypt, and Jordan giving them paychecks. If you see a paycheck coming from them, then they are the enemy. Too simply, right, I thought so. So wait until we get hit again. But once you fight fire with fire, see how fast they want to sign the "Terrorism," act.






United Nations Part 31; Peruvians Need Food Fast


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 21, 2004

The United Nations, believe it or not did one good thing, or is trying to do one good thing, or would like to do it, but hasn't done it, not sure why, but they are talking about it. I live in Peru as well as Minnesota, land of 13,000-thousand lakes (not 10,000-as they put on their car license-plates), and lots of cornfields. But the friendly people of southern Peru are starving to death - right this very minute. Their weather for some reason destroyed their harvests, and the UN has looked into this; someone must have kicked them in the chin. President Bush if you read anything today, read this--please.

The World Food Program [WFP] has said the people in Puno are getting little or nothing to eat up there in the southern region of the mountains. Where is the fly-ins with food? All going to some other place I think. We got some starving people over there, down there and then up. They could use a quick two or three million dollars to feed them for the next six months, it wouldn't take much on a world wide scale - Pepsi got more than that from the Iraqi Food Fund Program for Oil, for money lost during the l990 war - so it has been claimed (for an example). Call it emergency food or what. These people are the friendliest in the world, have done no one any harm, not like half the Islamic rebels around the world. If we can find food for them, feed our enemy, we are surely going backwards.

Severe storms in June took most of the food, or cereal crops. And during this time many of the households' animals died, they also starved to death, if not froze. A survey by the WFP has said 91% of the children are suffering with malnutrition in that area. Send the trucks, the planes lets get food to them. Everybody waiting on the US, while the fat cats and healthy millionaires-club at the UN discuss whose pockets the money is going to come out of, how about Annan's he's got a pocket full (by the time his scandal is over he may not); he's done his dirty deeds and can afford it anyway, but he's for Annan no one else, other than his son who he is most likely in business with. Time will tell.

It is well understood, half of Peru's population is below the poverty line; and of that 25% or close to 7-million in extreme poverty, they live on less than one dollar a day; are good Christian folk, not Islamic Killers. Geneva, wake up and send the money, take a few trucks out of the PLO-war zone (the ones you give to them to haul bombs back and forth with), and stop helping them kill Jews for a few days, and do a humanitarian deed. These people of Peru do not kill anything and are starving, and the UN gives them less priority than anyone else. It leads me to believe the more destruction you do, the more the UN wants to help you.

------------




United Nations Part 33; Bill Clinton As Secretary-General?


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 23, 2004

1
Bill Clinton for UNSG [chief]

A likely United Nations candidate: Bill Clinton. Yes, yes, he's going to try and fit into the big shoes of Kofi Annan, secretary-general. I thought about this all day, pondered on it. Good or bad idea. Well, here is what I came up with (don't like it turn the page). He'll never make it if Bush is president, and I don't blame him (blame Bush that is). If John Kerry is president, he will not like it either (a thorn in the butt), but it would be hard for Kerry not to assist him in his grab for the power strings at the UN. Will he be worse than Annan, not sure anyone can be. One of the problems I see is: he is the one that let bin Laden become The Bin Laden we know today. He could have taken him out of the story book, had he had enough guts, or is it courage, or indifference - its one or all three of them. Bush inherited what Clinton left behind and it was a big garbage can full. But I'm sure France, Germany, Russia and China would love to have him there, they can get what they want. And Hillary can start her prancing about Arafat again; I think she's got it for that guy, her hero. It can't be bad for the UN thought, or all that bad as far as image goes, they are as un-prestigious as a moron with a golden necklace. That is to say, when your down - how low can you go, because they are there, you got no place else to go: except if you start digging. Bill would love to live in the glass tower of the UN. Something tells me if Clinton gets in, if the Security Counsel lets him in, and Bill is running around buying votes this very minute; not sure what he is promising, or can offer the UN beside more controversy and scandal in the sexual area. He has Jimmy Carter backing him up, another loser. As I was about to say, if he gets in, we are in for a merry-go-round ride.

2
Lunatics Leading the World

There recently have been a number of books published on the affairs of the UN, but one in particular seems to have gotten the United Nations chief mad, Annan and his associates. Why: because they have exposed them, and if you think I have done a job trying to expose them, I've done nothing compared to these three authors. The UN is so mad they have tried to censure it, block its publishing, which of course only makes people more interested in what they do not want them to see. So I shall tell you what they do not want you to see, just a little: 1) The UN Bulgarian battalion of Criminal lunatics [drunk all the time], hired by the UN to fill quotas. 2) Haiti, Somalia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Rwanda and Liberia, "It actually allowed genocides in Rwanda and Bosnia," says the authors [Thomson, Cain and Postlewait/ considered whistle-blowers]]. They add also in so many words 3) there is lots of sex involved with the UN. Postlewait was almost killed in Somalia, and its seems she went a little crazy over there [calling it "Emergency sex"]. It is surely not a normal life she had to live under the UN-banner.

Thomson saw his share of body-bags, corpses in Rwanda and Bosnia, only to give this advice: "If blue-helmeted U.N. peacekeepers show up in our town or village and offer to protect you, run. Or else get weapons. Your lives are worth so much less than theirs."

As I have said once if not a hundred times, the blame goes to none other than Kofi Annan, it happened on his watch, just like the growth of al-Queda happened on Clinton's watch. We can blame Bush, but it is well understood when he took office, the plans were already in motion for 9/11.

The UN has over 100,000-personel, peacekeepers, and 17,000 of them making 1-billion dollars. Our train to destiny is not with Annan, or Clinton; just more scandalous, and more books about them wanting to be written; but it should be interesting.





United Nations Part 34; The Butchers From Damascus


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 24, 2004

You ever hear the old saying: when you want to get something done, that was urgent, needed at the moment: the other person says have patience, but adds "It's a slow boat to China." In a like manner, the world at large, and the United Nations [and Israel and the US] are all too slow to help little Lebanon. This is a growing issue, and the UN has only scratched its surface. A resolution is being passed, or has been [a few of them I think], but like Bosnia and Rwanda the world waits (not sure for what; more blood?), do we wait to enforce it while the Butchers from Damascus, keep butchering the kind and friendly Lebanese people.

They do have a hero, but the Syrians butchered him, Danny Chamoun. The Syrian Arab Republic did a good job on him, so good the nurses could only look in mortification at him and his family after the butchers took over, there was little they could do but clean him up. Kofi Annan! Listen-up, and watch - you are again, watching butchery and doing nothing (as you have done so many other times): the UN is supposed to be a place to create safety and peace. But again our ungrateful, secretary-general can do little but put forth a resolution that does very little to scare the Syrians. Ingrid Chamoun was full of blood like her husband from her head to her ankles, the Butchers from Damascus did a good job on her also, in what they call, traitors, whom are trying to stand up for liberty and freedom to run their country - in their own country. These folks do not get the benefits of what oil can bring, nor do they belong to the Ben Laden gang. That is why they have tried to build up Beirut, which was once the Berlin, and/or Paris of the Middle East. It was coming back to that, with the nation's hard work. Not like dusty-bowl of old Damascus.

- Danny Chamoun had a wholesome smile, and was a fighter, and family man, all the things a man should be. He didn't have to ask what a man was made of he was one. His wife was lovely, and so were his children, I think a boy and girl, they would have been proud of him, and he them. His family was assassinated on October 21, l990, this elegy is past due by a few days, if not a decade. But how long does one have to wait for the Syrians to withdraw their troops.

The Lebanese people do not want them there, Danny said: "Our President takes his orders from Damascus." And that is the whole picture in a nutshell. I'm surprised no other Arab countries have intervened to kick these nasty Syrian roaches out. Maybe they are too busy trying to scorn America, and can't find time to take care of its own kind, and so let the US deal with it.

The last legitimate and constitutional government in Lebanon was dismantled on Oct 13, l990, since then the government is a puppet n a subservient game to Syrian interests (if I know this, the UN has to know this, and the US President has to know this, and Paris and Berlin has to know this, and Cairo and Saudi Arabia has to know this, but where are you, hiding like an Oustrage over puny little Syria, no wonder Syria wants the Atomic Bomb; once they get it, they will never move out of Lebanon (it will become an annexed state, which in essence is now; unofficially). And here we are talking about one of the most horrific governments in support of terrorism worldwide ruling in violation of the United Nations resolutions; a country with some 40,000-troops hidden in the texture, not only taking their jobs away, so they cannot feed their children, but their freedom. Another Kuwait, without Saddam's oil or Kuwait's wealth; it is not really news to say, over one-million jobs have been lost to the citizens of Lebanon, and taken by untaxed Syrians. Here is a country begging for Democracy and liberty and where are we Americas, the United Nations, out playing volley ball?





United Nations Part 35; [Sour-Milk Issues]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 25, 2004

1
Gaming

I'll explain the sour milk in a moment, please have patience with me, I'm in slow motion this evening; the reason being, when I was working on this article in the coffee shop, I was reading the St. Paul, Pioneer Press paper, and our Governor was asking for the Indian Casinos of Minnesota to pay 25% of their earnings, or some figure around $350-million dollars. The paper said they make something like 1.4-billion off gaming. Than a spokes person for one of the tribes bluntly said, something to the effect: I'll talk but not negotiate (I think I read between the lines - : white man's greed again and breaking of Indian treaties again, the same old stuff: its kind of the old news really: can water get any wetter); the idea of the article, or what I got out of it was: you have no right to tax us or ask us to be taxed. They are probably right. So let's stop begging them and just build a hell of a lot of Casinos and put them out of business. Greed breeds greed. I'd rather go downtown and gamble [which I do not do much of, $20, every six-months] than drive forty-miles out to Treasure Island. This is a two way street, not a one way highway, as they'd like it (and in which they've had it for a very, very long time). Anyhow, competition is good for the spirit - right now they got a monopoly on the sport; I got distracted; I hope the Governor of Minnesota starts building tomorrow. Now that I think of it the UN should get into the gaming business, give more money to the Millionaires Club they secretly horde. Actually when I was a counselor, I was certified in screaming compulsive gamblers for compulsive gambling, like drug or alcohol addiction. But I really want to talk about is terrorism, and a few items that are presently sticking to them issues, and as always, the UN-has some kind of fluid that makes everything stick to them.

2
Fallujah/UN & Syria

This is not the time to negotiate either with the terrorist in Fallujah; when they start loosing the battle, like the PLO, they cry uncle, and run to the Iraqi government to talk, or to the UN to stop the bullies from winning the battles or war (an old trick to gain time to get re-supplied). Let's just win it, and forget about the crying, and do the talking later. I know this is not Annan's way or Clinton's, but then look at the mess we are in, and it is mostly because of them. I see also they have kidnapped an aid worker (British), it's a sad case again, but we do not stop wars because of that. They know [the enemy] "no," is the policy for such doings, that involves kidnapping, and than blackmailing, and I know "no," can be an adverb to negotiate, but we've already tired that. Once we stop and give into them (and the Iraqi Government has said no to their demands as well (Al-Arablyla Television)), once we stop, they will start killing employees at the Baghdad airport again, as they have done already. Recently four people were killed, and 11-wounded. Let us not forget also, the recent killings of three Iraqi workings in the Prime Minister Ayad Allawi's Office. You see, giving in is not the trick to acquiring peace.

What needs to be done, and what the UN and Syria are not doing, nor is its neighbors, is a simple equation that would bring about peace: bending two parallel lines, which would normally otherwise not meet, together. The US is trying to do that in Lebanon with Syria, but Syria is like the moon, which causes the wild tides of the ocean on earth to mount to a crisis. And the tides cannot fight the moon without the whole earth on its side, and the UN is suppose to be the representation of the world body, and they talk, and talk and talk. While people die, die and die. And should the US take action again, it would be alone to fight terrorism, and be named the bully again. So we stand back and watch Lebanon become a hornet's nest of Syrian discontent.

I'm sure some people in Lebanon are asking the question: what is the world waiting for; we are dying while our country is being taken over by Syria. It's being said in Africa, and has been said in Cambodia, and recently in Bosnia, and Kosovo. I'm not a politician, nor would I want to be in today's lawless world, but I do know nonsense from good-senses, and there is a lot of nonsense going on. There's an old saying: do we leave the milk in the cow so it doesn't get sour. In Lebanon that is what we are doing. We analyze until we become paralyzed.

------------



United Nations Part 39; John Kerry The Jew, UNSG/IAEA


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 28, 2004

Before I get in to the Jewish part of John Kerry’s life, let’s settle a few other issues. For those who didn’t know, John Kerry’s relative [a cousin] works at the IAEA, in Vienna. Second, Kerry’s wife was a former classmate of the Great and Honorable [piece of crap] Kofi Annan; the two go together possibly. And third, Mr. Kerry has solid Jewish roots, or so it seems. (A Vienna-based UN Staff member ((Let’s call him, Big Boy)) notified me of the information today). Now I don’t mind having a Jewish President, matter of fact when I learned this, I thought, could I change my vote now, but I still couldn’t, he is just too unchristian for me, John Kerry that is. But I don’t think he likes being a Jew, Christ was a Jew, Mr. Kerry. Anyhow, I need to give you some background. I had mentioned this a while back in another letter to you folks, but I wasn’t certain so I only implied I thought so. Now it seems to say (my information), ‘seeing is believing,’ for those who have more time, check out ‘Reform Judaism,’ online, and get his full history, by Jennifer Anne Perez, “A Jewish Czech in John Kerry’s Court.’ Sounds like a Mark Twain book.

She traces his history back to 1873; a son was born by the name of Fritz. Fritz became a brewer in Europe, in a world of German-speaking Catholics. Many Jews hid their names for business sake; I know this to be true, I went with a Jewish German in l970, in Augsburg, Germany [Chris Schmidt], she had told me she had to (her mother and herself) change their names during WWII, and run to London, after they took her father from their study, while they were hiding behind a sofa chair, and he was never heard of again. So I can believe Anne Perez’s research on this issue. Anyhow, the Jewish lineage goes on to l902, Fritz takes a wife Ida and an infant son is born, Fritz Kohn, henceforth he becomes known as Frederick Kerry. The Kerry family settle in Austria for a spell, and during their voyage across the Atlantic to Ellis Island, where my grandfather stopped on his way from Russia to the US also, so does John Kerry’s history, ‘…Kerry identifies his family as Germans from Austria…’ very convenient. Now they got a record.

In 2002, the story of his background came out more, Journalist Michael Kranish, helped piece the history together. Records were checked also in Poland and Prague, and Krakow by Gundacker. Everything was coming together. Gundacker and Stibor started to search archives. In l921, things did not settle very well for Fredrick Kerry’s American dream, and he ended it in suicide, he shot himself in the head after becoming almost bankrupt in the lobby washroom of Copley Plaza Hotel. He left a car, some stocks and $25-dollars. This came to light only this year. So we have a pot of crickets here.

My wife, who is from Peru, was reading my article and said: “You know, he doesn’t look gringo,” adding: “…matter of fact if you look at him closely, he looks Jew.”




United Nations Part 40; [St. Paul, Arafat, UN Greed]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 31, 2004

1
St. Paul

Just when I thought there was no hope for my dear lovely city of St. Paul, a light shines from the heavens, a hope light. We are the land of 10,000-lakes, and 10,000-biased judges [two being Finley and Rosas]; Judges that rule on tenant housing and feel sorry for the tenants no matter if the overwhelming evidence is in favor of the landlord (Rosas); and Finley who likes to make his own laws for the Second Amendment. We got a mess of senators also who are like the activist judges. But we got a good Governor, and now the St. Paul Pioneer Press, Minnesota’s oldest newspaper has selected Bush to be its mascot, sort of speaking, good, the Minneapolis Tribune is arrogant anyhow, we can live without them, they are in the city across the river, good place for them. We got a mayor who turned from Ferry, I mean Kerry, to Bush, kind a Benedict Arnold, but I’ll take him, as long as I can see him.

2


Al-khityar (Arafat)

Alas, Arafat got leukemia I heard; it seems to me he will be meeting his maker soon (if I were him, that would be scary), maybe. Sharon will be happy about that, and so will half the civilize world I’d expect. Maybe: Hillary, the UN (Annan in particular), Castro and a few other dictators, terrorist-groups, and war-hyenas will be a little sad, for a short time (such people are often forgotten quickly; like a puff of smoke that was, than was not); maybe even Paris will be sad, home of the terrorists, or day or two. Possibly Ahmad Qurei will get his job, lit would serve the world a lot better (I think).

3
UN-Greed

How can one cope with the world, or try to get straighten out when the United Nations is not worth taking serious; so the US sees the UN as (as I see the UN as), and many other countries. And should the US continue not see them as a serious entity to world peace, but as a hindrance, as they have been, with the 3rd world countries ruling the General Assembly, and trying to dictate to the US, there will be no reason to support it.

Russia and China together pay $35-million dollars to support three UN-facilities around the world, the US pays 7-billion, and Japan pays 6.5-billion (and Japan gets little or nothing out of it). Now why is not Annan telling Russia and China to pay more, they have the privileged of sitting on the five-seats that make the rules for the world. China can spend billions of dollars on war-materials; send there crap over here to us Americans to buy, but only 17-million on the United Nations. Something is very wrong here. Should the US walk out on the UN once and for all, I don’t there would be much reason to carry on with the UN, who would support it (Libya? They’d have to pump oil day and night). The only reason it has traction, is because of the US’s involvement.

So when we get all these jerks saying, ‘The US needs to do more,’ lets take a closer look at who is doing what, and who is not doing. Most are talking about the US, and how they should be doing this and that, while they are running to their banks with our tax money.




United Nations Part 41; Osama Bin Laden And More


By Dennis L. Siluk
Oct. 31, 2004

1
Big Bin

I see Osama bin Laden has tried to submit his vote in the soon to be US elections by trying to instill fear and using Bush as his stepping stone. Well, it is as you’d expect; if it wasn’t Bush, it would be Israel, or it would be Saudi Arabia, someone, somewhere would not be adjusting to his liking. With such a person you are never safe, nor can you ever please, not even his: wife, kids, father or mother are safe from him. The only thing sacred to him is his next meal, his toilet bowl, and who he gets to sleep with for the night. Even Allah his God is not sacred to him, for he is Allah’s equal, or so I hear him say (read between the lines).

2
Arafat’s Paris

I see Arafat flew into the safety arms of Paris again, and his longing wife who is some 30-years younger (nothing wrong with that, except he is about the ugliest man I’ve ever seen, but rank has it privileges, and money, and he needs them), his wife was waiting. Anyhow, he is ill, and his family of course is out of harms way, not like the rest of the Palestinians; maybe the war-mongrel will die, he is 75-years old you know (but I do not wish any harm); but he will be forgotten like a piece of crap flushed down the toilet a few years, or months after he’s gone, they all are, and they all think they will be remembered forever. He of course is Hillary’s hero, what a selection. He well not be I fear, any big discovery to God (God has dealt with many like him), and I doubt a hero in Allah’s eyes. And the world will be glad to have gotten rid of him, so where will he go. Only one place left. I am sure he would like to see Kerry in office before he crocks, and then he’d get on with Hillary again (Suha, be watchful of her, she has tiger eyes, and a hyena’s mind).

3
Ammo

I see the UN-has also cast their vote in whom they want as US President (as has the NAACP ((supposed to be none affiliated because of their tax exempt status)); and the Post Office) by announcing the missing 377-tonnes of ammo, at such a late date. Big deal, we already blew up 400-million tones of ammo in Iraq; why is this big event today? Even if we missed 377-tones (a drop in the bucket), we do not know all the circumstances surrounding it yet, and there are many possibilities. Again I ask, why did the United Nations wait until a few days (weeks) before the election to mention it? In Vietnam we lost more than that in a day loading convoys we thought were the good guys only to find out two days later they were the VC; no president got whipped for that. I think the military has done an outstanding job over there and Kerry and the UN are just Whistling Dixie.






United Nations Part 42; Mohamed Elbaradei And More


By Dennis L. Siluk
Nov. 1, 2004

1
UN-Mohamed Elbaradei

It is no coinsidence Mohamed Elbaradei plans on going to the UN to speak today he is the duck that follows UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan around, the head of the IAEA, in Vienna. The reason the UN is so eager to get rid of Bush, is that he exposes their incompetence; everyone is hanging loosely on to their jobs. It is why China is scared to have another Bush administration, Bush exposes, and no one wants to be exposed. China is a two-faced Panda Bear, and should any president look twice, they’d know that. Russia at least had the curtsy to back Bush up. The IAEA is so corrupt, and so wacky with the world nuclear foreknowledge, they are hiding behind Elbaradei, hoping he can put the last straw over Bush’s grave.

It should be obvious to votes tomorrow that the world has seen a new America, one that is no longer taking orders as it has for the past fifty years, it is rethinking its goals at a dearly cost, but we are keeping our values, which the world wants us to push aside, as they have. They want us to use our military power to assist them, not us. They want us to use our financial bank and influence to assist them. Some countries still need us others can live without us now that we have already rebuilt them. Well, that’s just par for the course. I do believe Bush has not pleased every one, not even me, but he is what the US needs, maybe not the world. But then who else does the world got: China and Russia and Europe: god help us all if that is the selection.

2
China

When I was in Vietnam (l971) China said we were ‘Paper Tigers,’ when they were killing Tibetan’s in Tibet, and saying their country belong to them, they were butchering them alive. A few million died, they had in intentions of killing the whole race but stopped short, just like the Japanese in Nan king they have no room to talk. They have worsened the world security: they threaten Taiwan with war, and Singapore is scared to death of them, and Japan is wondering how to get rid of them in the Japanese Sea, and South Korea is now skeptical. They have even tried to sway Australia from supporting the US. And China tells us how arrogant we are (they should talk). They loved us when we got them into the World Trade Organization, the Bush administration, that is, like spoiled brat. What they are worried about is Bush exposing them for who they are: a weak Panda bear with ambition to rule the whole coast line of Asia on that side of the world. They are happy about Europe not in touch with the US, and Europe should worry when the Panda Bear is happy, just like the Tibetan’s. Actually this would be a good time to go to war with China (a first and final strike would be great), and get rid of them once and for all, we’re going to have to sooner or later. And now we can beat the crap out of them. With them sending us all their carp, all they do is take jobs away, and build more nukes for the future. They are afraid of our first-strike philosophy because now they got to think twice.

3
German Jerks

A German said in Germany a few days ago in the FT-Newspaper, and I must translate it to how I perceived it: the American image is no longer a symbol of freedom or liberty (Gunter Habenmann). First of all it is a matter of opinion, if you ask the Afghanistan’s and the Iraqi’s, you might get a different estimation; if you go over to the New Europe, they may have a surprise for Gunter also.

I lived in Germany twice, l970 (for a year), and l974-77. I must say, Germans did not give Germany freedom, America did; but what I was about to say was: when I first arrived in Germany in l970, they spit at me while in my American uniform, and they haven’t stopped I see. So in one way, what Gunter is saying, is really old, nothing new. On the other had, they have lost jobs because of a few American businesses closing down, and a lot of Americans being reassigned to other countries (soldiers, can’t sell that pork), so they can not sell their crap to the American GI’s anymore. And American Tourism has mostly closed up, not like it used to be. And we took some Iraqi contracts away from them when we went to war: greed, greed, greed, and he uses liberty, how about the German symbol: greed, greed and more greed: just like the French. And they would like to get a permanent seat on the UN Security-Counsel, you got to be kidding.

You see, Europe believes the only war worth fighting is a European war, like in Bosnia, or Kosovo, even if a UN mandate was not properly given from the UN. My son was in Bosnia, I didn’t hear him say anything about that. If the US had not helped Europe in these little conflicts in the East, they would have beaten the crap out of them in the West. So when you talk about symbols, look in the mirror Germany, you’ve done nothing for anyone but yourself, like the French, and like Old Europe, you’ve drained our American tax money ($40-billion of it) a year on keeping your rude and ungrateful a… free.

4
Israel

Should the Jews move out of Gaza? I wouldn’t move them out, but I’m not the boss. On the other had, if it would create a home for Palestine and peace, I might give it a try. But then does the PLO or Hamas want peace. Their manifesto says no. It says that is the last think they want. It says: no peace at any price; rather, the destruction of Israel [or call it Zionism—however you want it dished out to you]. So have they changed their outlook—not really? So how do you acquire peace? Do like Egypt, Jordan, Syria and the rest of the Middle East have done, kick them out once and for all. No Arab country wants them, why should a Jew.


United Nations Part 44; [A Pot Of Crickets--Cloning]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Nov. 6, 2004

1
UN-Cloning

True Christians are of course against cloning [like stem cell research] because it requires organisms taken from the dead; kind of like robbing an underdeveloped corpse. Anyhow the United Nations was holding off, the committee’s delegations until after the US elections, hoping the US would co-sponsor the program. Actually they were hoping the US Government would pay the whole damn thing so they could put their money in the bank [possibly Annan’s idea]. These people are something else. They are mad because they cannot rob us blindly, and are not sure if they can with our eye-wide open. And people wonder why we do a double take on the UN. Belgium and twenty other atheists’ countries are supporting the project. Good, don’t bring it to the US, keep it in your own refrigerator.

Of course the UN is sad Kerry lost, they had special projects for him to do for them [Good Catholic boy Kerry], at our expense. Now they got to drain their piggy bank. Let’s hope we can now go for a total ban on the issue. Kerry, like the UN, like the EU was hoping the US had lost its moral values completely. How can Kerry every walk into a Christian Church again, is beyond me.

2
North Korea

Are we not getting tired of this back and forth crap of North Korea saying one day: we’ll negotiate, the next, forget it. My god, open your eyes UN, they have come out and told us, or so Kim Chang Guk has, totally rejected the IAEA [International Agency’s call]. Saying they are only tools for the US. In essence, screw off. Even Iran has a little more respect for the International Community [I think].

3
Iraqi Official

I see now that time has passed the UN is questioning the 377-tones of explosives that were missing after the war, saying [IAEA], they didn’t [don’t] really know what happened to them. You see, it all comes out in the wash, they try to hype it up to dethrone Bush, when in essence, it was all a ploy, all a sick dominated UN ploy to get their man Kerry into the White House so they can rob the US more. Is their no end to this ongoing free-riding UN.

4
China

China is dreaming it will be the 21st Centuries Asian undisputed power and the USA will not be able to defend it once they have their Qian Doctrine in place. You have to remember they are now planting seeds and will expect to harvest them in the next five to seven years. The Panda Bear can wait they have for 3000-years. Bush may set their plans back a few years though, with the Bush Doctrine. We need to do with Taiwan what we did for Israel, give them all they need to challenge the threats in the future, if we don’t we will be fighting them. Had we not with Israel, we’d be over there now fighting the PLO, but Israel can kick the crap out of anyone there so we don’t need to be there. Also let’s load Japan and South Korea down with all then Nukes they want; Japan is on China’s hit list, and so are the Philippines, and so is South Korea, Singapore, and Australia, or a starter. They are a little scared of Indonesia at the moment, but they are figuring that out.




United Nations Part 50; Poetic Justice For Kofi Annan


By Dennis L. Siluk
Nov. 22, 2004

I don’t believe life will allow me to see poetic-justice swamp over Kofi Annan’s head, our United Nations SG, life couldn’t be so fair, but miracles do happen. In any case, the UN employees are gong to take a historic vote of no confidence; due to his ongoing scandal and hideous rampage at the United Nations’ playground. Why has the whole world allowed this to go on for years, tells me we got a bunch of goofballs up there trying to lead the world—hide it from the public, and most of the world believes their dumb chitchat. Hitler once said: it is easier to fool the masses, than the few. I had a woman a few months email me, she just couldn’t believe the UN was so nasty: I, me, the messenger, was the guilty one she said. Well if that lady is still reading my comments, lay an egg on this one. I always shake my head when so many goofballs write me and have not looked into any of this and doesn’t even know where the UN’s are located, telling me how much they know, when all they know is a name that pops up now and then because Kofi Annan took a false-stance against Bush. Well now the truth is coming out.

He is guilty of giving aid to the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, yes embezzling billions of dollars, with and for Him. So when we go to war, we got to fight the pickled French, the Gestapo’s in Germany, and the Saddam lover’s at the UN, then we go to war. Why can we not, just have a nice little war, and get all the creeps out of our way, and it would not have cost us so many lives. Annan is guilty of killing 500 of our 1000-soldieres that died in Iraq; oh yes, had he not got in the way, we would not have had the insurgent problems we have now; and that is a proven fact. And out of the other 500-soldiers left, France and Germany is guilty of killing 250-of those lives, and we should not forget it. As the French said, “If the Americans are our true Allies, they will help us.” WWI. I think Ms Rice got their number; I hope so (that is, they only want to use us for their benefit). Yes, we need friends, but we do not need to support these kinds of friends who live to use us, and they’ve been doing that for years. It is like my wife ((Rosa)) has said who is from Peru: the only reason the Spanish are friends with Peru, is because they are allowed to continue to rob us blindly (they buy our companies out, and lay off thousands of employees; then they take the money to their country).

Back to Annan, the cannon, man of the world, of the hour. This creep even pardoned the criminal Dileep Nair, who has been accused of harassing UN members, sexually; this guy was facing charges of favoritism for sex. He was exonerated by Annan, after Catherine Bertini did a so called ‘review.’ Annan said, in essence: he had every ‘confidence,’ in Nair. Well Mr. Annan, you may have but no one else has any confidence in you (and that is the big problem). Annan and Nair are like two peas in a pod (so what would you expect to get, is exactly what you get), so what are we to believe. What an orgy parlor he runs. His son dealing with him and both robbing the ‘Food for oil,’ and now this; and all the other carp I’ve written about lately.

For all of us out there: me, you [and Big Boy], the observers, we need only wait a while longer to get the next episode of this live ongoing soap-opera. No wonder the US and Japan doesn’t want to spend 15-billion dollars on another year of paying 100,000-employess to shake their ass for the top dogs.






United Nations Part 49; [The Oversexed UN Workers]


By Dennis L. Siluk
Nov. 19, 2004

1
UN peacekeepers

Big Boy woke me today and said: “Look at this carp, the UN peacekeepers, the NCRI and IAEA, and Chirac on the Iraqi war.” Then he added, “Dennis we got to do something…” I hesitated, and said, “Like what?” And he said, “Article #49, you got to write another one!” He seemed kind of concerned, and to be honest, he is the one that has taken this matter more serious than I, and has done more work than I by providing the information. So I said, “You got it Big Boy; short and sweet.”

So we see the UN peacekeepers having their afternoon sexual appetite filled to the rim, or is it the brim of their cup. I respect Big Boy because he takes this UN thing serious, and wants to clean house, if only he could. Jean Marie Guehenno, a big shot at the United Nations, is calling for an overhaul of staff discipline, before it turns into a Sodom and Gomorra. So we got two people at the UN concerned with its integrity thing, thank God.

So what is happening out there at all three locations: New York City, Vienna, and Switzerland [Geneva]. I think we got some horny birds on the payroll: pumping away like there is no tomorrow. A survey has been taken and the problem is deep, deep rooted. Prostitutes, minors, by troops and civilians, its crazy: put on a blue-UN hat and pump away and you got the blessings of the United Nations: or had them. The Financial Times has done one good thing in the past six months, now that they got their biased ass off Bush for a minute, they are exposing this crap. I know the paper [FN] loves Annan, and is on the left bank most of its time, but it got a little courage and produced something worthwhile for once (go shake the trees in the Congo, see what falls out, maybe a child whore, with a blue-UN hate stuck to her ((or him)).

What we have here my friends are weak, mighty weak minded oversexed individuals [send them to Amsterdam and have them pay the red light ladies a few bucks and get it out of them, they get paid well].

2
NCRI/IAEA

I know, all these acronyms, The Vienna UN has the IAEA, or atomic watchdog for the United Nations; and the NCRI, the National Council of Resistance of Iran—the pro-choice for the IAEA people, and anti Iran nuclear folks are doing a better job than the IAEA in providing information on the Iranian Nuclear Development Programs over there, and are saying, they know were the secret sites are for Tehran’s nuclear program. So what are we doing: fighting with old Europe, as Europe takes their promise not to destroy the world with their secret sites once they get the bomb perfected? Israel is right around the corner, I think they will have to take them out, and tell the US, sorry but we got to, and tell the EU, move on over, or we’ll take you out with them, and they could: luckily they got the US protecting the them, they are so anti Jew [the EU], others wise I’d be tempted if I was Israel to move quicker.

3


Chirac

The goofball Chirac is running around France with his toad like face trying to play Napoleon with had full of rages. He is telling the world again, in so many words: gee, we should have kept Saddem in power, look at all the trouble we got with terrorism now: what a moron statement. Where is this guy, I mean he really thinks a nuclear Iraq world have been safer, then us taking him out. He thinks had we not got Saddam out, the terrorist’s would be baking cakes at the Lipp‘s café for the French President (they could care less about the frog faced goofball). I think they are still trying to figure out how to destroy the Eiffel Tower, as they have in the past (patience is their virtue; we know it, but we are too dumb to believe it). The only thing that is going to satisfy the Islamic left is to bury Israel, and break the bank in America, and a subservient EU. Other than that, you’re farting in the wind.






United Nations Part 48; Judges


By Dennis L. Siluk
Nov. 15, 2004

It seems to me lately our judges, not only in Minnesota, but in Washington DC feel they got the miracle touch to cure every and any thing put on their plate, even the Presidents owes. I know how the president must feel getting these noisy little critters up his nose; yes, just because they sit behind a bench, were give decision making power, they think for some reason they can use it at their discretion, without responsibility or accountability. Kind of like the United Nations is doing lately. We all want to think of the United Nations as our pure and clean path to peace and prosperity, and often by having the American tax payer making that possible. Likewise we like to think as our judges uncorrupted: but not anymore; they are turning out to be the worse spoiled meat in the pie. Now the judges—mostly activities and sympathy judges—in every city in America now I do believe, knowing little of the issues and subject at hand are making vital decisions not according to data under the law, or documentation, but go out of their way to bend it towards their way of thinking; their emotional, and ideological views. It is not only seen in people running up to the bench and trying to grab the judges because of their decisions, but many taking summer vacations in winter, or shopping on paid working time; and chumming with the ones paying for the decisions to be made on behalf of; sexual favors are not unheard of either.

District Judge Salvador R. Roses’ in Minnesota is on that list, knowing nothing, or very little on landlord vs. tenants disputes he favors the tenant over documentation and proof on behalf of the landlord. I’ve seen this a hundred times with Minnesota judges, not sure what is on their mind, and the referees in this area in Minnesota are even worse. Go to court and carry documentation with you in hand, and they don’t even look at it and rule on behalf of the tenant. It is not only outrageous; it is against all leases and proper ethics.

Judge Finley, with our 2nd Amendment, has done everything to stomp on it, cut it up, and try to burn it.

And the Supreme Courts, they are now using: judicial imagination to rule by; they have even gone farther with our president to fight tooth and nail with him. We do not rule by a judge’s imagination, or not suppose to, or public opinion, we rule by constitutional responsibility. John Ashcrof said it best, when he implied Judge James Robertson is trying to control the US Military now. Should we allow this, we will not need a President anymore. The Supreme Court Judges will be like the Senators of Rome [little-gods; like in Minnesota], back during its Republic days; we will only need a man to point his fingers to whoever wants to take the floor and take charge.






United Nations Part 46; Yassir Arafat Dies


By Dennis L. Siluk
Nov. 11, 2004

I found someone that thinks like me, or at least we both parallel each other in our writings, him in his book, and me in my last #46 Articles on the United Nations. The book is called, “Tower of Babble,” by Dore Gold. And he touches on basically the same things I have, but adds a little more spice to it, a little more history, and dives into areas that I skimmed over. But he does a great job of it. Let me point out some of his parallels: 1) The US must go outside the UN to protect itself from the terrorist and for national security (the UN is not going to save you) 2) he believes as I do, and so states it in his book: the UN jeopardizes the success of war on terrorism (they actually support it in many ways; and Dore Gold worked for the UN for many years to my understanding) 3) The UN has turned a blind eye on mass murder (and let me add, in the most recent cases, we can pick a half dozen locations in Africa that Annan, the SG of the UN has added to the murder list his incompetence). 4) Oil for Food, scandal is only the top of the iceberg (as we all know now by the news reports, Annan’s son has been linked to it) 5) Dore points out also, as I have in the past the UN’s failure has led five presidents to bypass the UN security council, one being Clinton, everyone forgets.

We must not allow the UN to take a major role in American foreign policy, which I have constantly pushed, and my friend from the Vienna UN [Big Boy], list we find ourselves their puppets. They will bury us in our own dirt with a clap of an eye, should we give them the chance.

If we look close enough we have not far to look back. In most of my articles I’ve used more recent data, but let me use Dore’s data of l994, the UN stood back and watched 800,000 Rwandan Tutiss’s slaughtered. They were warned of the extermination by the Hutu; by General Romeo Dallaire. I looked at the general’s face when this happened, it was a very sad face, a hopeless face; I remember this quite well.

—Annan, United Nations Secretary General, has befriended the terrorist group, Hezbollah (even took a pictures with the leaders), which is an element of al-Qaedo’s network. There is no blood in Annan’s face, no shame, no anything. He is part of the Palestinian terrorist group he has created in the UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency). The PLO is wearing UN uniforms with his blessings, and hang them up next to PLO-terrorist heroes in there rooms, which have killed Jews. And his world court condemns Israel, how dare the murderer stand tall in front of the world and proclaim his righteousness; he is the Antichrist’s assistant if anything. We should never, ever give ourselves over to the demonic World Court; it will be the end of America as we know it.

—In l991, if the US and Britain would not have assistant the escape of the Kurds out of Iraq, 1.5 million would have been killed, as the UN stood back and watched it happen. The UN is Satan’s parlor by all means. And thank God, Kerry never made it to the White House (we don’t know how lucky we really are), we’d be under the heal of the UN tomorrow. Had NATO not waited two years at the UN’s request, many lives would have been saved in Bosnia. And let us not forget, Syria is still a supporter of terrorism, the UN has done zero to protect mankind from these henchmen.

The United Nations seems to have done a good job in Humanitarian aid throughout the world that is about it. In any case, go check the book out it is a quick and good read; or go back through all my 46-articles.

[Yassir Arafat: Dies] Mr. Arafat died today, well, maybe now we can talk peace in the Middle East; I’m sure he is in Hell trying to yell to God he done such good job on earth killing so many people—helping Him get rid of the Jews, he deserves a award. Or maybe he’s looking for the whore house he was promised by Allah. Whatever, the world is better off without him, than with him; and we can all think God he took him.