Hanoi Jane [Jane Fonda]

Hanoi Jane [Jane Fonda]


By Dennis L. Siluk


In my book, Jan Fonda is mostly remembered for her activist movements, and her love for the Vietcong, vs. the indifference to the dying American soldiers during the Vietnam War. She, like Jean Penn, found it wholesome to go and sympathize with the enemy, and run back home to the safe America and make their millions, she should had stayed over there, like Penn, the two cowards.

Again, she is in the spot light with her movie “Monster-in-Law,” I wouldn’t see one of her movies, should they give me the theater free, or Sean Penn’s. Zebra strips can’t be wipe off so easily. A man recently I heard bared her movies from all four of his theaters, good for him, he’s my hero. Anyhow, Jane baby was known to us back then as Hanoi Jane and I know she apologized to the Vietnam Veterans, Hollywood style, you know, with the showmanship, smirk and all that crap.

She now proclaims to be a “Feminist Christian,” not sure what that exactly is, a new creature of some kind; something perhaps her and Shirley MacLean, devised. I mean, there is no such creature as a “Feminist Christian.” Never has been. What that really means is she’s a humanist and not a follower of Jesus Christ per se. Thus, she is part of the circle that believes she can buy her way into heaven under their own terms. I do not think the gates of heaven will bow to her new religion, it is a little stricter, nor is this Hollywood. I think she’s better off with her Hollywood party lifestyle than trying to fool the masses: she’s like a snake that sheds their sick: “Hanoi Jane!”

Jane, go talk to Shirley, you both belong to each other; and take the goofball Sean Penn with you, and Susan and Robinson, all silly ducks from Hollywood. Humanism is that last box of the end time doctrine and feminism is the last block to be placed in the box. So the only thing Hanoi Jane tells me is that we may be pretty close to end time events. Please don’t insult Christendom with your new form of Christology.